Carefully breaking down the popular projects on a leading exchange's Booster, I realized that the project with a 31% annualized return is actually based on a valuation of only 50 million. Looking at it from another perspective, which project on Booster was ever launched with a valuation not starting from 200 million or 300 million? Reversing the calculation, the actual return potential easily reaches an annualized range of 120% to 300%.
This comparison makes it clear—low-valuation projects can only attract limited capital, and once market enthusiasm heats up, the growth potential naturally increases. No wonder the quotas are snapped up immediately every time they are released; seasoned players have long understood this logic.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonlightGamer
· 7h ago
Haha, this is Booster's trick, with numbers one after another. So funny.
View OriginalReply0
ZenMiner
· 7h ago
Wow, now I understand why I can never grab the quota every time. It turns out the big players have already dominated it.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeaf
· 7h ago
Wow, now I understand why I get wiped out every time. Low-base projects really make a huge difference when they come together.
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapist
· 7h ago
Ha, it's the same old trick again. It sounds nice to call it undervalued, but actually it's just a small base making the numbers look good.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesis
· 7h ago
On-chain data shows that this valuation magic has long been monitored... With a low base, numbers can be easily inflated. No wonder experienced players are rushing to get quotas. Based on past experience, once this market breaks out of its circle, there's no turning back.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 7h ago
Damn, that's why I always get snatched up instantly—turns out it's all a low-value trap.
Carefully breaking down the popular projects on a leading exchange's Booster, I realized that the project with a 31% annualized return is actually based on a valuation of only 50 million. Looking at it from another perspective, which project on Booster was ever launched with a valuation not starting from 200 million or 300 million? Reversing the calculation, the actual return potential easily reaches an annualized range of 120% to 300%.
This comparison makes it clear—low-valuation projects can only attract limited capital, and once market enthusiasm heats up, the growth potential naturally increases. No wonder the quotas are snapped up immediately every time they are released; seasoned players have long understood this logic.