2026-01-17 02:30:21

Probably looking at something in the ballpark of $100m rather than hundreds of millions, if we're being real about it. That's where the numbers seem to stack up lol.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityLarry

· 01-19 12:21

About one hundred million, roughly. The number is right here, so there's nothing to boast about.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-18 16:30

One hundred million or several hundred million, the difference is quite big haha

View OriginalReply0

SellLowExpert

· 01-17 02:59

100m? Haha, this number looks a bit fake to me.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-17 02:59

Around one hundred million, that makes it more reliable.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 01-17 02:58

One hundred million dollars? Feels still too optimistic haha

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrying

· 01-17 02:56

About 100 million units, much more reliable than those exaggerated numbers haha

View OriginalReply0

PerennialLeek

· 01-17 02:51

About one hundred million, roughly. It’s not that exaggerated, haha.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCry

· 01-17 02:44

100 million dollars? Alright, that's not too bad. Much more honest than I expected, haha.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCoinSavant

· 01-17 02:30

nah $100m is where the math actually checks out, not this cope about 10x moonshots lmao. people really out here doing napkin math like it's peer-reviewed research

Reply0