Recently, I came across a project's design concept. Although the inspiration comes from existing ideas, approaching it from a different perspective is indeed interesting. Thinking carefully, on someChain, it seems I haven't seen this kind of gameplay before. This "reference + innovation" approach can sometimes reveal new market gaps. It feels worth paying attention to such differentiated ideas—it's not always necessary to be entirely original; identifying unmet needs within the ecosystem can also be an opportunity.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpStrategist
· 4h ago
The chip distribution shows that this kind of "differentiation" is often a false proposition. When the supply side cannot find genuine demand, in simple terms, it's just switching to a different chain to cut again.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHunter
· 5h ago
Well, just copy if you want, the key is to fill the gaps on a certain chain, that's the opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 5h ago
This project idea really hits the mark; approaching it from a different angle definitely has potential.
View OriginalReply0
ProveMyZK
· 5h ago
Finding gaps is much easier than hard innovation. Thumbs up for this idea.
Recently, I came across a project's design concept. Although the inspiration comes from existing ideas, approaching it from a different perspective is indeed interesting. Thinking carefully, on someChain, it seems I haven't seen this kind of gameplay before. This "reference + innovation" approach can sometimes reveal new market gaps. It feels worth paying attention to such differentiated ideas—it's not always necessary to be entirely original; identifying unmet needs within the ecosystem can also be an opportunity.