2026-01-16 20:26:19

The role of stablecoins is quietly changing. From their initial function as trading tools, they have evolved into fundamental assets for global payments, cross-border clearing and settlement, and even on-chain finance. However, a problem is now evident—most stablecoins still run on general-purpose public blockchains, which often face network congestion, soaring transaction fees, and suboptimal processing efficiency.

This pain point has not been ignored. Some projects realize that instead of letting stablecoins compete for resources on general-purpose chains, it’s better to create a dedicated lane for them. The Plasma behind $XPL embodies this idea—positioned as a Layer1 dedicated to stablecoin settlement.

How is it specialized? First, through scenario focus. By concentrating all underlying performance on the transfer, exchange, and clearing of stablecoins, it theoretically achieves lower latency and costs. Second, ecosystem compatibility is maintained—fully supporting EVM, allowing existing protocol developers to migrate quickly and build payment applications, lending protocols, or even derivatives directly on top.

Of course, community consensus is also crucial. The ongoing creator ranking mechanism essentially promotes the growth of a genuine content ecosystem and rejects fake interactions. This is more important for the project’s long-term development than short-term hype.

From another perspective, if stablecoins truly become the "water" of future finance, then the dedicated "pipeline" built for them is not just a bonus but a necessity. While all public chains compete for a universal ecosystem, choosing to deepen development in a highly certain track may be the real source of competitive advantage.

XPL1,26%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZenChainWalker

· 9h ago

The idea of an exclusive lane is indeed brilliant, but it still depends on how well it performs in practice. A dedicated chain for stablecoins sounds good, but the key is whether the community can really support it. Being both Layer1 and EVM-compatible—this pattern is familiar... The only concern is that it might just become another empty public chain. By the way, can this creator ranking mechanism really prevent fake interactions? It still seems to rely on users' self-discipline. The metaphor of "water" in finance is spot on, but if the pipeline is laid out well, will users come?

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 11h ago

The analogy of the dedicated lane is excellent, but can it really solve the gas fee hell? Let's hear what others say.

View OriginalReply0

ImaginaryWhale

· 11h ago

The concept of an exclusive lane really hits the mark, but how many of them can actually be implemented? Speaking of which, everyone is now touting Layer 1, but the key still depends on whether TPS and costs can reach mainstream levels. Stablecoin dedicated chains? Interesting, but the real indicator is whether the ecosystem can grow. EVM compatibility is well done, saving developers from relearning new things. The community consensus part feels a bit hollow. Can the creator rankings truly prevent fake orders? Believe it or not, I’ll just watch first. If Bitcoin really becomes a financial infrastructure, such dedicated tracks will indeed be very popular. But as always, going on-chain is easy, building the ecosystem is hard. Let’s wait for actual data.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichVictim

· 11h ago

Stablecoin dedicated chains sound good, but how many can truly be implemented? Feels like just another fundraising story. --- Everyone is now hyping up EVM compatibility, but the key still depends on actual transaction volume. --- Community consensus sounds nice, but in the end, it's still about who raises more funds and who has the louder voice. --- Exclusive lanes sound great, but I'm worried it might just become another empty chain. --- Transaction fee issues are indeed a pain point, but can dedicated chains solve them? I remain skeptical. --- Creating a creator leaderboard—feels like just another way to manipulate users. --- Stablecoins definitely need to speed up, but will Plasma's approach work? It all depends on the actual data. --- Layer 1 again? This track is already competitive enough; it's unlikely to stand out. --- Low latency and low cost are what every new public chain claims, but the key is whether the ecosystem can develop. --- If you ask me, instead of building new chains, it's better for existing public chains to lower transaction fees.

View OriginalReply0

Web3ExplorerLin

· 11h ago

hypothesis: if stablecoins really become the "water" of future finance, then treating every layer1 as a universal highway is just... inefficient infrastructure design, ngl. plasma's doing the silk road play here—specialized corridors beat congested superhighways every time.

Reply0

PseudoIntellectual

· 11h ago

The idea of a dedicated stablecoin chain sounds nice, but when it comes to actual implementation, I have to ask whether it can really eliminate the gas fees on other public chains. Everyone says it's EVM-compatible, but isn't that just the same old approach?

View OriginalReply0