When it comes to prediction markets, there's consensus that we're still in early innings. The reality is, only a handful of use cases have shown genuine staying power and real-world traction so far. What's particularly constraining growth? The liquidity problem. Most traditional market makers lack the tools and expertise to effectively price prediction market assets or supply sufficient liquidity—especially once you venture beyond the straightforward sports betting niche. This gap remains a significant bottleneck for broader adoption.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainBrokenPromisevip
· 10h ago
Liquidity bottleneck is really annoying; market makers just don't understand this system at all.
View OriginalReply0
HodlAndChillvip
· 10h ago
Liquidity is indeed a bottleneck, but to be honest, we're still in the conceptual hype stage, and the actual usable scenarios are scarce...
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHuntervip
· 10h ago
Liquidity issues are really a dead end; besides sports betting, who the hell wants to mess with this stuff?
View OriginalReply0
ForkMongervip
· 10h ago
honestly the liquidity excuse is just lazy governance theater. real problem's the protocol design itself—nobody wants to build on fundamentally broken incentive structures. watch what happens when someone finally forks with proper market mechanics.
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)