I've personally tested Genius and encountered quite a few issues in the past couple of days. First of all, the user experience is not very good—frequent lag, system errors, occasional transaction failures, and the cost of operations worth hundreds of USDT has skyrocketed to 2-4 times the original. The scores on the spinning wheel also shrank significantly, directly reduced by ten times.
What's even more heartbreaking is that, according to the project's rules and logic, this wear mechanism will only increase over time. Comparing this to the earnings from careful operations the day before, the difference is quite obvious. It seems that the project's mechanism design still needs substantial optimization, or else user cost pressure will continue to rise. Under these conditions, participant enthusiasm will definitely be affected.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BitcoinDaddy
· 7h ago
This wear mechanism is really outrageous. The cost doubles in just two days. Does Genius want to kill itself?
Lag and error causing transaction failures—what kind of experience is this? The money is still depreciating...
Spin wheel scores reduced tenfold? No way. Is this project serious?
If this logic continues, users will eventually leave. Who would still dare to play?
If the mechanism can't be changed, it's definitely going to fail. Why do more and more projects seem to be like this?
View OriginalReply0
CexIsBad
· 7h ago
Hundreds of USDT lost in just a moment, this is outrageous, it should have been sold long ago
Spin wheel tenfold shrinkage? No wonder so many people are quitting recently
The mechanism is increasingly坑用户, this project will cool off sooner or later
Lag failure with a set of combo punches, who can bear the exploding costs
Honestly, Genius's operation is a bit ruthless, like directly割韭菜
Could still make money the day before yesterday, but today it's a complete loss, this contrast is a bit extreme
Upgrading the wear mechanism to the max? Does the project team have a brain?
Costs double, profits cut in half, how can this go on?
No, no, I also have to consider撤了, this set of logic is toxic
View OriginalReply0
Fren_Not_Food
· 7h ago
Wearing down hundreds of U to 2-4 times, how much effort does that take…
The explosion in costs clearly indicates there are design flaws
Genius really dropped the ball this time; we're used to lag and errors, and now we're still paying
The mechanism is becoming more and more rigid; who would still keep playing?
The roulette wheel is ten times smaller? Just go bankrupt already
What kind of optimization is this project even called? Purely a blood-sucking scheme to harvest leek users
View OriginalReply0
tx_or_didn't_happen
· 8h ago
Losing 2-4 times in just a few hundred U is what the hell is this thing?
It's tolerable when the lag fails, but the increasingly harsh wear mechanism is truly incredible. How is this supposed to be played?
Genius really pulled it off; the wheel score is directly reduced tenfold, I'm stunned.
This broken mechanism design makes it feel like the project team never intended for people to make money.
The previous day's earnings were decent, but now it's a total loss, the difference is ridiculously huge.
Frequent system errors cause operation failures, almost turning the costs upside down.
Honestly, if this continues, who will still want to play? User enthusiasm will definitely decline sharply.
The wheel shrinks tenfold? Isn't this just money grabbing?
The wear mechanism is getting higher and higher; how can we operate in the future? It's a lose-lose situation.
The earnings from the day before are all wiped out today; this kind of momentum is truly incredible.
I've personally tested Genius and encountered quite a few issues in the past couple of days. First of all, the user experience is not very good—frequent lag, system errors, occasional transaction failures, and the cost of operations worth hundreds of USDT has skyrocketed to 2-4 times the original. The scores on the spinning wheel also shrank significantly, directly reduced by ten times.
What's even more heartbreaking is that, according to the project's rules and logic, this wear mechanism will only increase over time. Comparing this to the earnings from careful operations the day before, the difference is quite obvious. It seems that the project's mechanism design still needs substantial optimization, or else user cost pressure will continue to rise. Under these conditions, participant enthusiasm will definitely be affected.