2026-01-15 06:33:42

Recently experienced some on-chain trading activities and found USD1 trading competition particularly worth mentioning. Many projects can attract attention just through publicity, but USD1 is different — the actual liquidity of 2.5 million USD has truly been poured into the pool, and the slippage and depth during trading clearly show the difference.

To be honest, many on-chain activities nowadays are just hype harvesters, with impressive data but popularity that comes and goes quickly. USD1's approach this time is the opposite — it seems to be seriously refining the infrastructure of the trading environment. Real liquidity depth and smooth trading experience — these unseen details are actually what can best retain users.

Compared to those flashy gimmicks, this fundamental approach rooted in core skills is more meaningful for building a sustainable ecosystem. I believe that as the ecosystems of mainstream chains like BNB continue to improve, projects that focus on trading experience will become increasingly valued.

USD10,03%

BNB-1,59%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TooScaredToSell

· 15h ago

2.5 million liquidity directly poured in, now that's playing for real, not some data-inflated crappy event --- Hold on, did the slippage really level out that much? I need to try it myself to believe it --- Another one talking about basic skills, will it still be alive next week? We'll see --- Reliable projects are indeed rare, but I remain skeptical. Let's wait another three months --- With such fierce competition in the track, how long can just pouring in liquidity sustain it? --- Finally, someone takes trading experience seriously. Most projects are really just for fun --- I just want to ask, if it's so good, why not go directly to Coinbase? --- The depth is indeed good, but user retention always depends on the token price, brother --- It looks ideal, but we still need market testing to see how it actually performs --- Real liquidity definitely scores points, other projects would have been hyped up long ago

View OriginalReply0

EthSandwichHero

· 15h ago

250 million in genuine liquidity really makes a difference; slippage is smooth and genuine --- Another project claiming to build an ecosystem, let's see the data after half a year --- Rooted in fundamentals sounds comfortable, but honestly, most projects end up dying because of lack of hype --- Liquidity depth has indeed been overlooked; many projects just talk about concepts --- But to be fair, 250 million isn't much depth in mainstream chains, let's see how long it can sustain --- This is what I call doing things seriously, much better than those who just post announcements every day --- Good trading experience is what keeps users; this logic is sound --- Interesting, finally some projects understand the importance of liquidity --- Well said, but I still want to see the performance data after three months --- Thumbs up for this approach, it's practical

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationTherapist

· 15h ago

Investing $2.5 million in real money makes a real difference, and slippage indeed becomes smoother. This is what we call real action. NG, most projects are just hype, but the reverse operation at USD1 is somewhat interesting. Liquidity depth and other details are easily overlooked, but they truly determine user retention. No matter how loud the hype, it can't compare to a genuine trading experience. Rooting in fundamentals is a clever move. Finally seeing projects seriously building infrastructure, as ecosystem sustainability is the true way to go. Compared to those gimmicks that cut leeks, only this kind can survive long-term.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainUndercover

· 15h ago

2.5 million in real gold and silver invested—that's true sincerity, unlike some projects that just talk big all day long. Real liquidity depth is the key; low slippage ensures a better experience and keeps users engaged. Just bragging is useless; actions speak louder. This is the difference, projects rooted in solid fundamentals are indeed more resilient.

View OriginalReply0