When it comes to moving real assets onto the blockchain, to be honest: current projects in the market are either using concepts as a smokescreen, fooling people with a renamed crypto system; or they keep talking about "compliance," only to be brought back to reality by regulatory inquiries. Dusk, on the other hand, takes a different approach — it stitches privacy and compliance, two seemingly opposing concepts, together tightly. From protocol to application layer, everything revolves around this core, targeting institutions that truly have assets to bring on-chain. Today, let's break it down and discuss in detail what makes Dusk's approach good, and what areas are worth paying close attention to.
First, a point to clarify upfront: Dusk is not a flashy marketing chain designed to grab eyeballs, nor is it a project confined to laboratory demonstrations. Instead, it is genuinely pushing into traditional financial institutions with real effort. It clearly understands what regulators care about, what auditors value, and how institutions can operate with confidence. It then locks all these requirements into the chain logic through technical means. Since the mainnet launched on January 7, 2025, the project has completed its first round of market stress testing. The current stage of implementation shows that it is capable of onboarding more regulated assets onto the chain. In the broader Web3 ecosystem, this progress can indeed be considered solid.
So here’s the question — why is it so difficult for institutions to bring assets on-chain? Essentially, it boils down to two issues that cannot be bypassed or avoided. The first is privacy: if you expose transaction counterparties, transaction sizes, and business logic on a public chain, competitors can quickly figure out your secrets. Not to mention whether you can make a profit, even your business layout will be exposed. For traditional financial institutions, this is no different from self-sabotage.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunter_9000
· 15h ago
Can privacy and compliance be achieved simultaneously? It depends on whether Dusk is truly hands-on or just talk.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 15h ago
Privacy compliance and this old adversary finally have someone trying to reconcile them, but there are still many pitfalls when it comes to truly going on-chain. Let's see how long Dusk can last.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropworkerZhang
· 15h ago
Privacy + compliance is indeed a powerful combination that addresses the pain points of institutional on-chain activities. However, there are many projects claiming to do this, but few actually succeed. Why is it so difficult?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKey
· 15h ago
Privacy and compliance are just stitched together? Sounds good, but let's talk after it's truly implemented.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLicker
· 15h ago
The combination of privacy + compliance indeed hits the pain points of traditional finance, but whether anyone dares to use it once it’s truly on the chain remains to be seen.
When it comes to moving real assets onto the blockchain, to be honest: current projects in the market are either using concepts as a smokescreen, fooling people with a renamed crypto system; or they keep talking about "compliance," only to be brought back to reality by regulatory inquiries. Dusk, on the other hand, takes a different approach — it stitches privacy and compliance, two seemingly opposing concepts, together tightly. From protocol to application layer, everything revolves around this core, targeting institutions that truly have assets to bring on-chain. Today, let's break it down and discuss in detail what makes Dusk's approach good, and what areas are worth paying close attention to.
First, a point to clarify upfront: Dusk is not a flashy marketing chain designed to grab eyeballs, nor is it a project confined to laboratory demonstrations. Instead, it is genuinely pushing into traditional financial institutions with real effort. It clearly understands what regulators care about, what auditors value, and how institutions can operate with confidence. It then locks all these requirements into the chain logic through technical means. Since the mainnet launched on January 7, 2025, the project has completed its first round of market stress testing. The current stage of implementation shows that it is capable of onboarding more regulated assets onto the chain. In the broader Web3 ecosystem, this progress can indeed be considered solid.
So here’s the question — why is it so difficult for institutions to bring assets on-chain? Essentially, it boils down to two issues that cannot be bypassed or avoided. The first is privacy: if you expose transaction counterparties, transaction sizes, and business logic on a public chain, competitors can quickly figure out your secrets. Not to mention whether you can make a profit, even your business layout will be exposed. For traditional financial institutions, this is no different from self-sabotage.