This project had solid fundamentals—DEX integration, token burn mechanics, reduced dev supply—yet the team's decision to cap upside at 500k+ seems counterintuitive. The mechanics were in place for a real run, so why not let it play out? The choice to constrain potential when the infrastructure supported growth raises questions about project strategy and long-term vision. Sometimes teams miss the bigger picture when they have a winning setup already on the table.

TOKEN-2,58%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationSurvivorvip
· 01-15 06:08
Really, seeing this kind of self-destructive operation just makes me angry. Clearly, the architecture is already set up, yet they add limits to themselves—this logic is truly incredible...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggarvip
· 01-15 06:06
NGL, how clear-headed does this team have to be? They have such a good mechanism, yet they insist on killing it themselves... Is 500k enough?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8vip
· 01-15 05:58
This team is a bit unreasonable. They've clearly set up the mechanism, but then artificially limit the cap. I don't understand.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysMissingTopsvip
· 01-15 05:56
It feels like the team has got it backwards, with such solid fundamentals, why are they tying themselves up?
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClubvip
· 01-15 05:41
It's really outrageous. The fundamentals are so strong, yet you insist on cutting your own legs. Isn't 500k really not greedy?
View OriginalReply0
TokenCreatorOPvip
· 01-15 05:40
Oh my God, has this team lost their minds? They clearly have such a solid infrastructure, yet they insist on shackling themselves.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)