Demo phase chaos: users are absolutely feasting on rewards, and the treasury is feeling the heat. The project's generous distribution strategy—literally paying players to participate—is putting serious strain on the token economics. When incentives are this rich, you've got community members who are here purely for the yields, and naturally the on-chain activity reflects that drain. It's the classic Web3 dilemma: how aggressive can you be with player rewards without nuking your long-term sustainability? The team clearly loves their holders enough to subsidize gameplay, but watching the treasury get picked clean in real-time is a different beast. Whether this is intentional stress-testing or a genuine concern about runway, it's the kind of problem that separates projects with solid tokenomics from those that burn out fast.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WinterWarmthCatvip
· 15h ago
Airdrop wool-harvesting feast, treasury being drained... This is the truth of the demo phase.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiacvip
· 15h ago
This is a classic incentive compatibility problem—short-term eye-catching, long-term pitfalls. I've seen too many cases like this, and in the end, it's just a mess. --- Ultimately, it's still a matter of mechanism design not being thought through clearly; it's too late for remedial measures now. --- The issue isn't about being overly generous in distribution but about lacking an exit strategy with gradient decay. The Silicon Valley VCs tried this long ago. --- Really, the feeling of treasury bleeding is like watching your proposals get rejected one by one... a sense of helplessness is at its peak. --- This is how yield farming locusts behave—projects digging their own pits, so who can they blame? --- So, without a sound governance mechanism to constrain distribution rights, problems will eventually arise. The script has long been written in history. --- I think this is also a way of signaling "don't do this" to the entire ecosystem while digging your own grave. --- The current question is, has the team realized this? Or are they still numb?
View OriginalReply0
0xOverleveragedvip
· 15h ago
Quite true, it's just burning money to buy activity, and this move was a bit rushed.
View OriginalReply0
ShadowStakervip
· 15h ago
ngl this is just unsustainable yield farming with extra steps. teams always think burning the treasury to bootstrap engagement won't bite them later—spoiler: it does
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)