Discord faces ongoing pressure to maintain community activity — it needs to retain core users while continuously attracting new members. This double-edged dilemma is almost an unavoidable challenge for all decentralized communities.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroHero
· 11h ago
It has been proven that Discord's retention curve should have been subjected to in-depth data analysis long ago. The protocol architecture issue regarding core user churn rate versus new user conversion rate indeed requires technical validation.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 16h ago
In plain terms, it's about wanting to have both the fish and the bear's paw, but reality is always harsh.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 16h ago
To be honest, this is a false proposition. the core users have already formed their own groups, and newcomers can't be retained. It's not a Discord problem at all.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 16h ago
Isn't this the Achilles' heel of all communities? Newcomers arrive, veterans leave; veterans stay, newcomers find it boring.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 16h ago
Well, this is a deadlock. When newcomers arrive, the seniors get annoyed; when the seniors leave, the newcomers can't be retained.
Discord faces ongoing pressure to maintain community activity — it needs to retain core users while continuously attracting new members. This double-edged dilemma is almost an unavoidable challenge for all decentralized communities.