The rise of digital dollar stablecoins on public blockchains has reshaped how we think about monetary systems. At its core, stablecoin regulation operates through what's essentially a sophisticated market mechanism—government maintains a buyer-of-last-resort function for US short-term Treasury securities, which essentially represent government-backed liquidity.
This framework emerged from regulatory guidance issued between 2020 and 2021, establishing how stablecoin issuers could operate within the existing financial infrastructure. The mechanism is elegant: stablecoins maintain their peg to the dollar while Treasury holdings serve as the reserve backbone, creating a direct link between blockchain-based money and traditional government debt markets.
The system essentially uses stablecoins as a bridge between decentralized networks and conventional monetary policy tools. When stablecoin reserves hold US Treasuries, they're not just collecting yield—they're participating in a nested structure where blockchain rails carry government-issued debt instruments across permissionless ledgers.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-7b078580
· 18h ago
Although, the logic of backing with government bonds sounds quite perfect, the data shows that the real stress test hasn't arrived yet. Let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
wagmi_eventually
· 18h ago
Wait, in the end, stablecoins still rely on US Treasuries for backing? It feels like we're back to the centralized approach again.
View OriginalReply0
Rekt_Recovery
· 18h ago
ngl this is just traditional finance wearing a blockchain costume... gov debt on-chain? that's not revolution, that's regulatory capture with extra steps. been there, got liquidated on that thesis lol
Reply0
TradFiRefugee
· 18h ago
Basically, stablecoins have become intermediaries between central banks and the on-chain world. Isn't this the same old trick of traditional finance in a new disguise?
Backed by government bonds sounds stable, but doesn't this still mean being led around by the traditional financial system?
Wait, if the logic is that stablecoins are originally meant to be bridges, then what is the significance of decentralization?
It feels like once the regulatory framework is in place, stablecoins have shifted from wild to domesticated versions.
Using US Treasury bonds as reserves—doesn't this forcibly drag DeFi into CeFi?
Stablecoin Economics and Regulatory Framework
The rise of digital dollar stablecoins on public blockchains has reshaped how we think about monetary systems. At its core, stablecoin regulation operates through what's essentially a sophisticated market mechanism—government maintains a buyer-of-last-resort function for US short-term Treasury securities, which essentially represent government-backed liquidity.
This framework emerged from regulatory guidance issued between 2020 and 2021, establishing how stablecoin issuers could operate within the existing financial infrastructure. The mechanism is elegant: stablecoins maintain their peg to the dollar while Treasury holdings serve as the reserve backbone, creating a direct link between blockchain-based money and traditional government debt markets.
The system essentially uses stablecoins as a bridge between decentralized networks and conventional monetary policy tools. When stablecoin reserves hold US Treasuries, they're not just collecting yield—they're participating in a nested structure where blockchain rails carry government-issued debt instruments across permissionless ledgers.