The Clarity Act in its current form presents significant structural problems for decentralized finance development. The issue that stands out isn't about partisan blame—it's the asymmetry in how this legislation gets scrutinized. While the policy draws criticism from certain quarters, there's a notable silence from others who might logically be expected to weigh in. Why aren't more voices pointing out these regulatory gaps? It's worth asking why some stakeholders stay quiet when the long-term implications for DeFi could be considerable.

DEFI-1,33%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ProposalDetectivevip
· 10h ago
Why are so many people pretending to be asleep about this bill? Is it true?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWhisperervip
· 15h ago
NGL, this bill is really a bad hand; the key issue is why those who should speak out are all turning a deaf ear.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 15h ago
The silent supply line is the most dangerous; when stakeholders remain silent, it's often the night before a major explosion.
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollectorvip
· 15h ago
Hmm... There's really a story behind this silence; the利益链 is too deep.
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorkingvip
· 15h ago
The silence of regulation is indeed strange; are the big players all pretending to be dead?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)