2026-01-12 01:23:04

Recently, I have been paying attention to the CAI airdrop project, with an expected score in the 240-256 range, belonging to the AI track. To be honest, from a fundamental perspective, it seems somewhat weak, and these kinds of no-name products often have limited market enthusiasm. However, based on current pricing estimates, the $30 to $40 range is still worth paying attention to.

Since January, there have indeed been many airdrop opportunities, and several major projects have also emerged one after another, making it a good window for participants. To increase returns, strategy is key—taking $LISA as an example, small, frequent participation can effectively reduce single-event risk and avoid being caught in a squeeze. But one thing to watch out for is that recent market signals show signs of weakening, and the possibility of a waterfall decline is increasing. Managing risk well is more important than anything else.

Overall, the January airdrop season is full of opportunities but also hidden risks. Project quality varies greatly, so maintaining a cautious attitude is crucial—don't blindly chase high prices. Small, incremental testing is always more reliable than going all-in.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SmartContractWorker

· 16h ago

30 to 40 USD? I think it's risky. Projects like these often break below the listing price. Better to wait and see. --- The small amount, high frequency approach is indeed reliable. I do the same, and those who go all-in usually end up with bad results. --- Another AI track and a product with no three guarantees. I've smelled this kind of situation too many times. This wave might just be another trap. --- I also participated in the LISA wave. I'm just worried that if the market drops again, risk management must come first. --- You're right. January indeed offers many opportunities, but the quality varies greatly. We need to stay sharp. --- The waterfall is already on its way. Everyone, prepare yourselves mentally. The lessons from small-scale testing are blood lessons. --- Projects with weak fundamentals I will directly pass on. Instead of gambling, it's better to look for solid big players.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-3824aa38

· 01-12 01:49

$30 to $40, sounds okay but not enough to push higher Unverified products are indeed prone to failure; I don't really trust the fundamentals Small, frequent trades are still reliable; at least you won't die if you're caught in a trap The market is weak lately, so you really need to be cautious; a waterfall could come at any time

View OriginalReply0

RetailTherapist

· 01-12 01:44

The $30-40 price range is a bit risky; it depends on whether the fundamentals can support it. --- Small amounts with high frequency are truly the way to go. Once you've been squeezed once, you'll understand. --- January indeed has many projects, but most are just for profit-taking. Choosing the right target is key. --- CAI... to put it simply, it's gambling. Mental preparation is the most important. --- Don't panic when a waterfall occurs; stop-loss when necessary, and recover your funds over time. --- I usually pass on products with no certifications, as the risks are too high and not worth it. --- LISA's small-scale testing approach is good, but it requires time to monitor. --- Even good projects can be dumped; there's no absolute certainty in this industry. Be cautious, and you'll be fine.

View OriginalReply0