2026-01-11 19:26:41

Blockchain can indeed solve some problems in this area: fast speed, low costs, and automated processes.

The issue is that it is too transparent. Institutions like banks simply cannot use a system where all data is visible and there is no legal control. That is why, despite the obvious technological advantages, traditional financial institutions' adoption of public blockchains remains limited.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FUD_Vaccinated

· 13m ago

There's nothing wrong with that, but I think that's the charm of blockchain—transparency is inherently a feature, not a bug. Banks want a black box, while we want an inverse black box; these are fundamentally two different worlds.

View OriginalReply0

Fren_Not_Food

· 01-11 19:56

Transparency is indeed a double-edged sword; banks want a controllable black box, not a democratic ledger.

View OriginalReply0

PumpDetector

· 01-11 19:46

transparency's the feature, not the bug. banks just aren't built for it lol. that's literally the whole point tho

Reply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 01-11 19:39

Staring at the gas tracker late into the night, I find that when it's cheap, I don't have enough funds to go on chain. This is my life. --- **Comment:** Banks are just afraid of the on-chain ledger; saving on miner tips can't bridge this trust gap.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerProfit