Here's a hot take that probably won't land well: why does crypto keep leaning on social media as the backbone for spreading critical project information? Think about it—when Fortune 500 companies drop important announcements, you're not seeing them tweet it out as the primary channel. Yet somehow the blockchain industry has normalized treating Twitter and Discord like official communications hubs. Real institutional players maintain dedicated channels, legal documentation, and structured disclosure processes. Maybe it's time the space grew up and stopped treating temporary social feeds as substitute for legitimate information infrastructure. The dependency is fragile, unsustainable, and frankly embarrassing next to actual corporate governance standards.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 1h ago
ngl that really hit me in the heart... but on second thought, crypto is originally about opposing institutions, so that's why I choose social media.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 4h ago
That's true, but do you know why? Retail investors just love this approach. A single tweet spreads much faster than ten legal documents.
View OriginalReply0
ValidatorViking
· 9h ago
nah this hits different tho... watched too many validator networks go dark bc some admin nuked their discord. that's not resilience, that's asking to get slashed. real infrastructure doesn't live on temporary feeds fr
Reply0
AirdropNinja
· 01-11 20:42
That's right, but we all know this is just the norm in crypto.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Bro
· 01-11 14:58
ngl, this point actually hits... but on second thought, the crypto community has always been anti-institutional, right? Twitter and Discord actually seem more decentralized and more "democratic," right?
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmare
· 01-11 14:57
The crypto world is just about quick gains, and can't really build proper infrastructure.
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoat
· 01-11 14:55
That's true, but isn't this the current situation in our circle... Retail investors are crushed by information asymmetry, and they have to rely on Discord gossip to survive.
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearcher
· 01-11 14:49
To put it bluntly, this is just retail investor mentality not having changed. They really think that posting on Twitter can replace official disclosures...
View OriginalReply0
NewPumpamentals
· 01-11 14:43
To be honest, this hits the nerve... But isn't this the norm in our circle? Let's wait until an actual institution takes over before saying anything.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweeper
· 01-11 14:32
nah this is exactly the weak signal retail keeps missing... while they're glued to discord, real accumulation happens elsewhere. institutions already know this lmao
Here's a hot take that probably won't land well: why does crypto keep leaning on social media as the backbone for spreading critical project information? Think about it—when Fortune 500 companies drop important announcements, you're not seeing them tweet it out as the primary channel. Yet somehow the blockchain industry has normalized treating Twitter and Discord like official communications hubs. Real institutional players maintain dedicated channels, legal documentation, and structured disclosure processes. Maybe it's time the space grew up and stopped treating temporary social feeds as substitute for legitimate information infrastructure. The dependency is fragile, unsustainable, and frankly embarrassing next to actual corporate governance standards.