A luxury timepiece hammered down for SFr3.1 million ($3.4 million) at auction—only for collectors to raise red flags about its authenticity afterward. The incident has sparked fresh scrutiny into the prevalence of so-called "frankenwatches" in high-end markets: vintage pieces assembled from mismatched or counterfeit components that pass initial inspection but crumble under expert examination. What's troubling isn't just the individual fraud cases—it's the broader pattern exposing cracks in authentication standards across the luxury industry. When seven-figure assets can slip through verification procedures only to be questioned post-sale, it raises uncomfortable questions about trust, market integrity, and whether current safeguards are simply theater.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BrokenRugs
· 12h ago
ngl this is why I don't touch high-end watches... really burns money and you have to gamble on luck
View OriginalReply0
WagmiOrRekt
· 13h ago
NGL, this is just ridiculous. Bought a watch worth 3.4 million and found out it's Frankenstein... How embarrassing is that, haha.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMaskedRider
· 19h ago
3.4 million USD "assembled watch"? This certification process is just a formality.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 01-13 08:12
Honestly, this is wild... The watch worth 3.4 million USD is assembled with counterfeit parts? LOL, is this what they call the "luxury market"?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropworkerZhang
· 01-11 13:53
A valuation of 3.4 million USD can be just assembled parts, this appraisal mechanism is hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
RatioHunter
· 01-11 13:50
ngl that's why I never touch the auction house's old stuff, who knows who assembled it.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiHarvester
· 01-11 13:41
Can you still buy fake ones at such a high price? The auction house's verification is a complete sham.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoDouble-O-Seven
· 01-11 13:35
A $3.4 million valuation can't even be contained; this authentication mechanism is really a joke.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 01-11 13:26
NGL, this is really embarrassing. Spending 3 million on a fake watch... The authentication process is just a joke, right?
A luxury timepiece hammered down for SFr3.1 million ($3.4 million) at auction—only for collectors to raise red flags about its authenticity afterward. The incident has sparked fresh scrutiny into the prevalence of so-called "frankenwatches" in high-end markets: vintage pieces assembled from mismatched or counterfeit components that pass initial inspection but crumble under expert examination. What's troubling isn't just the individual fraud cases—it's the broader pattern exposing cracks in authentication standards across the luxury industry. When seven-figure assets can slip through verification procedures only to be questioned post-sale, it raises uncomfortable questions about trust, market integrity, and whether current safeguards are simply theater.