2026-01-10 13:29:55

These years, Bitcoin's price trajectory has been quite bizarre. Some estimate that after the New Year, the price will hover around 100 million RMB, which is approximately 15 million USDT. Looking decades into the future, 1 Satoshi might equal 1 US dollar, at which point 1 BTC would be in the hundreds of millions of dollars range. Going even further, 1 Satoshi will far surpass 1 US dollar.

What does this reflect? Mainstream global currencies are gradually losing trust, and the banknotes issued by various countries' central banks are slowly depreciating. Nobel laureate in Economics Hayek once advocated for free-market economics, and his theories predicted this moment—national currencies are no longer the only option, and governments can only exercise regulatory functions. The market determines the true winners through physical-level free choice. These economic philosophies have been realized in the most silent way—without bloodshed conflicts or ongoing brainwashing.

Bitcoin offers the right to free choice. People are no longer passively accepting a single currency but actively choosing in the market. The design principles of multi-layer verification mechanisms have permeated all aspects of social operation—payments are faster, even launch commands for nuclear weapons require verification by the majority of the system before execution, thus thoroughly avoiding the absurd scenario of "a finger twitch" destroying the world.

On a larger scale, listed companies operate on the blockchain, and the strength of the economy between countries is largely reflected by the amount of BTC held. This thing has long become a major financial tool—simply put, a financial weapon.

Looking back to the starting point, what evaluations has Bitcoin experienced? Blockchain is unreliable, low performance, worthless, a Ponzi scheme, a tool for crime, destined to be banned, just a geek's utopian fantasy, no one will use it, complex and hard to understand... Even Nobel laureate Krugman once made quite foolish comments.

Who is right and who is wrong? Time will prove everything.

BTC0,21%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHunter

· 16h ago

1 billion USD? It might really happen, the central bank's paper currency is indeed shrinking --- Hayek was right, now I finally understand how incredible his prophecy was --- Krugman's words are truly amazing, even Nobel laureates have their moments of failure --- The idea of a national financial weapon is interesting, it feels like it should have been included in papers long ago --- Wait, do missile launches also require multi-signature verification? That would be truly ridiculous --- I've always said, on-chain is the future, believe it or not --- The day when smart contracts equal the US dollar, I don't know if I will still be alive to see it --- From Ponzi schemes to financial instruments, this path has indeed been quite winding --- The freedom of choice sounds great, but most people are still being exploited --- Anyway, I am firmly bullish, waiting to enjoy the big gains

View OriginalReply0

FOMOmonster

· 16h ago

$100 million per coin? I think that's still too conservative. The central bank is printing money like crazy, BTC is the real safe-haven asset, alright? Krugman's group should have shut up long ago. They've been proven wrong so many times and are still talking. Loss of trust in national currencies is a certainty; no one can reverse this trend. On-chain operations have already begun; most people just haven't realized it yet. Hayek has already explained it clearly: the right to free choice is the key. I laughed at the detail of using multiple verification mechanisms to handle nuclear weapons—too brilliant. The amount of BTC held = a country's economic strength. This is not a joke; it's reality. History will treat early HODLers well. Now is the last chance to get on board. Time proves everything. In a few years, you'll know who was the fool.

View OriginalReply0

ChainProspector

· 16h ago

1 billion dollars? Dream on, stop bragging. 2 When 1 Satoshi equals 1 dollar, that will be the true endgame. 3 Hayek has already made it clear, but no one listened. 4 To be honest, those still questioning BTC haven't thought through economics. 5 The judgment that financial weapons are indeed ruthless is correct, but not wrong. 6 Krugman's remarks back then were indeed outrageous, he must be embarrassed now. 7 Even nuclear weapons require multi-signature, and some still think they hold the power of the purse? Haha. 8 On-chain operations have long been underway, but most people are still sleepwalking. 9 The number of BTC determines national strength; this logic holds up. 10 Those hoarding coins are laughing now, but they'll be laughing even more on the day of on-chain settlement. 11 The right to free choice is expressed most accurately here. 12 Time will prove everything, but the key is that you have to live until that day.

View OriginalReply0

LightningAllInHero

· 16h ago

One hundred million dollars? Bro, your prediction is way too conservative. Krugman and those guys should have shut up long ago. They keep bearish every day, but they’re quite dedicated. When the central bank’s printing press turns, our money is just losing water value. Isn’t that obvious? The real financial war has already started; most people just haven’t realized it yet. I believe that smart contracts will eventually become hard currency. When that happens, let’s see who’s still trading fiat. I’m impressed by the multi-factor authentication part. Even nuclear weapons require democratic approval—no one has that kind of imagination. The argument is well-made, but it’s too idealistic. How will we pass the regulatory hurdle? Time will indeed prove everything. Anyway, I’ve already moved my BTC to a cold wallet to gather dust.

View OriginalReply0