There's this growing paradox worth thinking about—as we develop AI and digital entities that outperform humans in nearly every measurable way, what's the trajectory for biological humans? The speed of AI advancement keeps raising the bar on what 'better' even means. When machines can optimize faster, learn deeper, and execute more efficiently across basically any domain, it forces the question: how do biological organisms stay relevant in that equation? It's not just about being smarter anymore; it's about the fundamental gap between digital and organic systems continuing to widen.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugDocDetective
· 15h ago
Honestly, these kinds of discussions always feel like something's missing... Can human value really only be measured by "performance metrics"?
View OriginalReply0
Rekt_Recovery
· 15h ago
ngl this hits different after getting liquidated for trying to "optimize" my portfolio lol... humans adapting slower than algos? yeah that tracks. been there, survived it, still here typing this. copium fuel aint renewable either way
Reply0
gm_or_ngmi
· 15h ago
Isn't this question asked backwards? Humanity's true value doesn't lie in those quantifiable things at all.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfit
· 15h ago
It still depends on human creativity. No matter how advanced machines are, they can't generate new ideas.
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwich
· 15h ago
Oh no, isn't this the question we've all been thinking about... The more AI advances, the more humans get involved.
Where are our biological advantages? I really can't think of any.
We've already lost the IQ arms race, what else do we have?
Recently, I feel that humanity's core competitiveness is just "sorry."
Forget it, let's do what we're good at, like slacking off and involution.
There's this growing paradox worth thinking about—as we develop AI and digital entities that outperform humans in nearly every measurable way, what's the trajectory for biological humans? The speed of AI advancement keeps raising the bar on what 'better' even means. When machines can optimize faster, learn deeper, and execute more efficiently across basically any domain, it forces the question: how do biological organisms stay relevant in that equation? It's not just about being smarter anymore; it's about the fundamental gap between digital and organic systems continuing to widen.