Recently, I have been tracking many new projects, and 0G immediately caught my eye. From a fundamental perspective, this project's funding has already exceeded $560 million—given the current market environment, reaching this level either indicates that the track itself is highly scarce or that the team is exceptionally capable. 0G falls into the latter category, and what's more interesting is that although it shares the same founders as CFX, the capital camps attracted by the two projects are completely different. 0G is supported entirely by top international institutions, and this kind of endorsement is indeed more valuable than that of conventional projects.
Ultimately, the value of a project still depends on the team. This is also what makes 0G most attractive—the entire founding team can be described as a "gathering of technical elites." Headquartered in San Francisco, USA, it naturally possesses an international character. Driven by four co-founders, the team has about 50 members. At first glance, the scale isn't particularly large, but the personnel composition is truly luxurious: 4 professors, 8 PhDs. This educational background structure is considered top-tier in the industry. Many projects' core teams don't even have decent technical backgrounds, but 0G's team comes from scientific research and academic backgrounds, with solid technical genes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketBarber
· 6h ago
$560 million invested, this lineup definitely has some strength
Compared to those projects relying on stories for funding, 0G's academic background is truly rare
4 professors and 8 doctors, a top-tier industry configuration
But raising so much money also brings significant pressure; future delivery capability is the real highlight
CFX's guy is working on new things, did he bet right this time?
The key still depends on the performance after the mainnet launch; no matter how luxurious the on-paper setup is, it must be implemented
Endorsement from top international institutions indicates that the white paper is not made up, this is a valuable point
Compared to domestic KOL scams, the US team is much more reliable
Large funding scale ≠ high value; some people in the crypto circle still don't understand this principle
A team of 50 people managing so many capital relationships is quite interesting
View OriginalReply0
FlatTax
· 6h ago
56 million USD in funding, backed by international institutions, this lineup is indeed top-tier.
The educational background of the 0G team is astonishing, with 4 professors and 8 PhDs, rare in the industry.
CFX and 0G share the same group of founders, but the capital attracted is completely different, and this difference really explains the issue.
With such a large amount of funding, either the track is exceptional or the team is strong; 0G clearly falls into the latter.
A team of 50 people may seem small, but their quality truly outperforms most projects.
Top international institutions are all supporting this, and the endorsement value is indeed different.
A team with an academic background and strong technical genes is truly rare.
Instead of just looking at the funding numbers, it's better to see who is investing; 0G's lineup is indeed meticulous.
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 6h ago
Raising 560 million is really impressive; the endorsement from major international institutions is truly top-notch.
I've rarely seen such a strong academic background—4 professors and 8 PhDs? That lineup is indeed outstanding.
Compared to the founding team of CFX, the stark contrast in capital orientation between the two projects is quite interesting.
A funding round of 50 million USD—what level is that in the current environmental protection track? Can someone interpret it?
Having fewer team members actually makes the team seem more valuable; the quality can truly surpass those low-quality teams with hundreds of people.
The San Francisco team naturally has an international vibe, and their solid technical background is an undeniable fact.
Wait, how have the previous projects of these four founders performed? What are their historical track records?
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDiver
· 6h ago
560 million USD? Wow, that's an incredible amount of funding, but the team composition is indeed impressive.
Four professors and eight PhDs, much stronger than most projects. Purely technical backgrounds make a big difference.
Was CFX also developed by this same group? Why does it seem like 0G is gaining more popularity now? Has the capital's taste changed?
Recently, I have been tracking many new projects, and 0G immediately caught my eye. From a fundamental perspective, this project's funding has already exceeded $560 million—given the current market environment, reaching this level either indicates that the track itself is highly scarce or that the team is exceptionally capable. 0G falls into the latter category, and what's more interesting is that although it shares the same founders as CFX, the capital camps attracted by the two projects are completely different. 0G is supported entirely by top international institutions, and this kind of endorsement is indeed more valuable than that of conventional projects.
Ultimately, the value of a project still depends on the team. This is also what makes 0G most attractive—the entire founding team can be described as a "gathering of technical elites." Headquartered in San Francisco, USA, it naturally possesses an international character. Driven by four co-founders, the team has about 50 members. At first glance, the scale isn't particularly large, but the personnel composition is truly luxurious: 4 professors, 8 PhDs. This educational background structure is considered top-tier in the industry. Many projects' core teams don't even have decent technical backgrounds, but 0G's team comes from scientific research and academic backgrounds, with solid technical genes.