【BiTu】Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov recently proposed a fund allocation plan to distribute 17.45 million CRV tokens, equivalent to approximately $6.2 million, to the development company Swiss Stake AG. The funds will mainly be used for ecosystem development, technological research and development, and protocol iteration, directly supporting a core development team of about 25 members under Swiss Stake AG.
From the proposal details, the purpose of the funds is quite clear: optimize existing Curve infrastructure, promote the new version and expand features of the Llamalend lending system, develop on-chain foreign exchange trading modules, while also enhancing user interface experience and cross-chain interoperability. These directions are beneficial for the protocol’s long-term competitiveness.
However, the voting results were unexpected — 54.46% of participants voted against, with only 45.54% supporting. More notably, there is a clear利益格局 behind these opposition votes: addresses associated with Yearn Finance and Convex Finance almost monopolized all 90% of the opposition votes.
The divided voting has sparked deeper reflection within the community. Many members pointed out that this incident exposes a tricky issue: Is Curve’s governance decision-making tilting towards a few large holders? On the other hand, some suggested that Swiss Stake AG should be more transparent about past fund usage, providing a clear account of historical expenditures before approval of a new round of financing. Others believe that instead of a one-time large token payout, a phased payment approach would be better, which can avoid impacting the CRV price and leave more room for observation for the project and community.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchroedingerGas
· 2025-12-26 19:27
Hmm... Yearn and Convex teaming up to oppose, this move is indeed interesting. Large-scale financing being rejected indicates that governance still has a voice, but the real question is, can it truly check and balance?
View OriginalReply0
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 2025-12-26 18:20
According to the database, Yearn and Convex jointly oppose this matter. How long has it been since the last Curve pledge for funding transparency? It is recommended to be included in the Guinness World Records.
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeek
· 2025-12-26 13:18
Whoa, Yearn and Convex teaming up to oppose? Things are getting interesting, the big whales are fighting now.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamer
· 2025-12-26 03:41
Are Yearn and Convex opposing each other? These two big players have really teamed up, it feels like CRV is about to make a big move...
View OriginalReply0
DaoDeveloper
· 2025-12-24 06:36
honestly the voting mechanics here are fascinating from a game-theoretic standpoint... when you've got concentrated stakeholders like yearn and convex flexing veto power, you're essentially looking at a plutocracy wrapped in governance theater. the irony? it mirrors traditional finance's institutional gatekeeping, just with merkle trees instead of boardrooms.
Reply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
· 2025-12-24 06:35
Here we go again with this. Yearn and Convex teaming up to oppose is just ridiculous. Isn't this just big whales balancing each other?
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 2025-12-24 06:22
With 6.2 million dollars invested, Yearn and Convex simply say no. Is this what you call decentralization? Laughs.
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 2025-12-24 06:19
That's the problem with DeFi—founders just come up with ideas and want to throw money at them, only to get shut down by Yearn and Convex directly, haha.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRun
· 2025-12-24 06:12
This large funding round was opposed by Yearn and Convex jointly, indicating that DeFi governance is really starting to show signs of centralization, which is a bit risky.
Curve large-scale funding proposal rejected: Yearn and Convex jointly oppose, concerns over centralization in DeFi governance emerge
【BiTu】Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov recently proposed a fund allocation plan to distribute 17.45 million CRV tokens, equivalent to approximately $6.2 million, to the development company Swiss Stake AG. The funds will mainly be used for ecosystem development, technological research and development, and protocol iteration, directly supporting a core development team of about 25 members under Swiss Stake AG.
From the proposal details, the purpose of the funds is quite clear: optimize existing Curve infrastructure, promote the new version and expand features of the Llamalend lending system, develop on-chain foreign exchange trading modules, while also enhancing user interface experience and cross-chain interoperability. These directions are beneficial for the protocol’s long-term competitiveness.
However, the voting results were unexpected — 54.46% of participants voted against, with only 45.54% supporting. More notably, there is a clear利益格局 behind these opposition votes: addresses associated with Yearn Finance and Convex Finance almost monopolized all 90% of the opposition votes.
The divided voting has sparked deeper reflection within the community. Many members pointed out that this incident exposes a tricky issue: Is Curve’s governance decision-making tilting towards a few large holders? On the other hand, some suggested that Swiss Stake AG should be more transparent about past fund usage, providing a clear account of historical expenditures before approval of a new round of financing. Others believe that instead of a one-time large token payout, a phased payment approach would be better, which can avoid impacting the CRV price and leave more room for observation for the project and community.