#加密货币监管框架建设 The regulatory framework is gradually becoming clearer, which is actually a good thing for us profit-seekers. The official stance is very clear - "If it can't be clearly managed, it won't be developed," indicating that compliant and transparent projects will be valued.
What does this mean? Airdrop opportunities will increasingly be concentrated in the hands of legitimate players. Only projects with real backgrounds and regulatory scrutiny are worth engaging with. Junk projects and scams will be naturally eliminated, which can actually lower your costs.
Here are a few suggestions for everyone: First, prioritize new projects with a legitimate capital background or support from exchanges, as they have a much lower risk factor; second, it is essential to clearly understand the compliance trends of the project before engaging, and avoid blindly following trends; third, maintain sensitivity, as regulatory policies can affect the actual value of projects, and early analysis can help seize the best interaction window.
In simple terms, standardization is not a bad thing, as long as you learn to find opportunities within the framework, the costs can actually be optimized.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#加密货币监管框架建设 The regulatory framework is gradually becoming clearer, which is actually a good thing for us profit-seekers. The official stance is very clear - "If it can't be clearly managed, it won't be developed," indicating that compliant and transparent projects will be valued.
What does this mean? Airdrop opportunities will increasingly be concentrated in the hands of legitimate players. Only projects with real backgrounds and regulatory scrutiny are worth engaging with. Junk projects and scams will be naturally eliminated, which can actually lower your costs.
Here are a few suggestions for everyone: First, prioritize new projects with a legitimate capital background or support from exchanges, as they have a much lower risk factor; second, it is essential to clearly understand the compliance trends of the project before engaging, and avoid blindly following trends; third, maintain sensitivity, as regulatory policies can affect the actual value of projects, and early analysis can help seize the best interaction window.
In simple terms, standardization is not a bad thing, as long as you learn to find opportunities within the framework, the costs can actually be optimized.