#稳定币 After reading this reflective article, I have some things I want to say.

The author spent eight years working in a casino, and only realized this point in the end, which is indeed a bit late. But his saying, "Watch what they do, not what they say," is particularly useful for those who are into speculative trading.

The project parties claim they want to revolutionize and build a new financial system, but in reality? Most of their energy is spent on creating coins, fundraising, and generating FOMO, with very few having real applications. Stablecoins are indeed an exception—USDC and USDT are genuinely solving real problems such as cross-border transfers and asset storage; these are not just empty words.

The message is clear for us: **Don't get carried away by the narrative; first look at the project's interaction design and actual applications**. If a project can only rely on airdrops to stimulate user interaction without real product stickiness, then it is a casino model. However, if airdrops are centered around stablecoins or real payment scenarios, then that is the direction worth participating in.

In simple terms: when selecting a project, ask yourself one question—will people still use this project without the token incentives? If the answer is "no one will use it," then don't waste your time. Look for interactions related to infrastructure and stablecoin ecosystems that have low costs, low risks, and guaranteed profits.