#Meme币市场 The clarification of CZ's control over Twitter is, to put it bluntly, a defense against the chaotic situation in the Meme coin market. Although the recent DOYR incident looks like a blunder—a $9.7 million bubble triggered by a typo from He Yi—the underlying issues it reflects are worth pondering: every move of a celebrity can cause a frenzy of capital inflow, which is both an opportunity and a trap for us copy traders.
Previously, the community questioned the overlap between the official Twitter and the issuance time of a certain Meme coin. Although Binance later responded with a zero-tolerance attitude, what does this incident suggest? It means we should not blindly follow the trends of hot figures. My current strategy is as follows—observe those traders who maintain rational stop-losses during the fluctuations of Meme coins, rather than going all-in on the hotspots; these types of traders have a more reliable risk control awareness.
Meme coins have no fundamental support; their prices are purely driven by emotions, and the volatility can eat away most of the profits. Instead of copy trading those accounts that chase prices during the Meme frenzy, it's better to find those with clear allocation logic and the courage to cut losses quickly. In this round of the market, those who truly make money are often not the ones who bet correctly on the trend, but those who manage to exit before the trend breaks. Experience has taught me that controlling drawdowns is always more sustainable than pursuing huge profits.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#Meme币市场 The clarification of CZ's control over Twitter is, to put it bluntly, a defense against the chaotic situation in the Meme coin market. Although the recent DOYR incident looks like a blunder—a $9.7 million bubble triggered by a typo from He Yi—the underlying issues it reflects are worth pondering: every move of a celebrity can cause a frenzy of capital inflow, which is both an opportunity and a trap for us copy traders.
Previously, the community questioned the overlap between the official Twitter and the issuance time of a certain Meme coin. Although Binance later responded with a zero-tolerance attitude, what does this incident suggest? It means we should not blindly follow the trends of hot figures. My current strategy is as follows—observe those traders who maintain rational stop-losses during the fluctuations of Meme coins, rather than going all-in on the hotspots; these types of traders have a more reliable risk control awareness.
Meme coins have no fundamental support; their prices are purely driven by emotions, and the volatility can eat away most of the profits. Instead of copy trading those accounts that chase prices during the Meme frenzy, it's better to find those with clear allocation logic and the courage to cut losses quickly. In this round of the market, those who truly make money are often not the ones who bet correctly on the trend, but those who manage to exit before the trend breaks. Experience has taught me that controlling drawdowns is always more sustainable than pursuing huge profits.