Market-driven governance structures that align participant incentives tend to produce superior outcomes. When stakeholders have genuine capital at stake, their decision-making improves markedly across multiple dimensions.

Recent performance data supports this thesis: funds deployed through incentive-aligned governance frameworks have significantly outperformed alternative models on nearly every metric tracked. The single exception proves interesting rather than problematic.

With a 10-day redemption window approaching, the track record is nearly flawless. This window will serve as a decisive moment—demonstrating whether mechanism design built on genuine skin-in-the-game principles can sustain its edge when participants face real exit opportunities. The results so far suggest market-based incentives work precisely as theory predicts.