I recently observed an interesting phenomenon—despite both being published books, the levels of attention and recognition vary so greatly.
Books related to ETH can reach a popularity of 80M, a book by the CEO of a leading exchange only 2M, and Elon Musk's book can reach 150K. At first glance, this numerical combination seems a bit chaotic, but upon reflection, what does it reveal?
In fact, it reflects that everyone's standards for "cognitive value" vary widely. Some buy based on technology, some are influenced by personal impact, and others focus on practicality. This might be why the cryptocurrency market is always full of controversy—because our definitions of value itself differ.
Instead of arguing about who is right or wrong, it's better to consider what your own decision-making logic is.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SoliditySurvivor
· 14h ago
Numbers are all over the place, man. This is an information war.
Wait, Musk's book is only 150K? Are you sure these numbers aren't reversed?
Cognitive value? Honestly, it's just about who has more fans.
Choice logic? My logic is just following the trend, what about you?
Is the 80M ETH book real or just marketing numbers? Has anyone verified it?
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 22h ago
Basically, it's just information asymmetry. Technical topics always attract more followers than personality.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkie
· 12-14 23:08
Honestly, this data comparison is a bit outrageous... ETH's 80M can crush the CEO's 2M, yet Elon Musk's is only at 150K? Something seems off.
Wait, this choice logic... Could it be that everyone is just following the hype? Technical themes are always more valuable than reputation.
The statement that "value definitions are different" is correct, but we all know in our hearts — it's ultimately about following the trend and FOMO.
Actually, it's all pointless; it still depends on who can attract the next wave of bagholders.
Those who truly understand their own selection logic probably wouldn't be torn apart here.
This is how the crypto community is — always lacking consensus, only利益分化.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 12-14 23:07
Still just comforting oneself under the banner of "cognitive value." Honestly, it's all about seeing who can cut whom.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorer
· 12-14 22:50
What does this numerical difference indicate? It's still just people's trust levels being different.
---
Wait, how is 150K even less than 80M? Haha, author, you didn't do the math right.
---
To put it simply, the logic of chasing popularity is completely messed up. No one buys into CEO books.
---
Stop it. The idea of cognitive value sounds good, but at the core, it's still flow that wins everything.
---
My logic is very simple—if it's useful, check it out; if not, get lost, regardless of who the author is.
---
The crypto circle is always like this. Today, you chase this cognition; tomorrow, you'll be proven wrong. Cycle repeats.
---
Wake up, everyone. The ranking based on popularity is a joke in itself. Whoever can fleece the leeks wins.
---
Actually, I just want to see who can really make money; everything else is nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 12-14 22:42
Is a 150K Musk book less popular than an 80M ETH book? Where does this data come from? It seems a bit off.
I recently observed an interesting phenomenon—despite both being published books, the levels of attention and recognition vary so greatly.
Books related to ETH can reach a popularity of 80M, a book by the CEO of a leading exchange only 2M, and Elon Musk's book can reach 150K. At first glance, this numerical combination seems a bit chaotic, but upon reflection, what does it reveal?
In fact, it reflects that everyone's standards for "cognitive value" vary widely. Some buy based on technology, some are influenced by personal impact, and others focus on practicality. This might be why the cryptocurrency market is always full of controversy—because our definitions of value itself differ.
Instead of arguing about who is right or wrong, it's better to consider what your own decision-making logic is.