Honestly, I don't follow the hype around Litecoin's hot news. I've always felt that those micro-strategy companies are just adding noise to LTC and can't help it break through.

I remember before the ETF was listed, I clearly pointed out where the risks were—once the limited circulation volume gets bought in, the whole market will look awkward. The subsequent trend played out exactly as I predicted, and it's because of this accurate judgment that I still have some confidence in my market instincts.

That's also why I have no resonance with those mindless bulls in the square. Our perspectives on LTC are fundamentally on different levels.

I've repeatedly expressed my genuine logic for being optimistic about LTC. Summarized into these points: the long-term transfer of strong consensus funds to weak consensus funds, macro-level price trend patterns, its rare true monetary properties, and the valuable POW mining mechanism. Once the market experiences enough disturbance and a key event triggers, this long-standing POW coin's dormant consensus will gradually awaken.

Looking at the entire crypto space now, there are actually very few POW assets with real weight—BTC is of course in the first tier, LTC, DOGE, BCH are also on the list, and recently ZEC's consensus is gradually forming. But for new POW coins to enter this circle, the difficulty is increasing. These years of accumulated consensus are completely different from the situation of most POS coins.

Of course, I’m not entirely extremely bearish on POS. Many POS projects are actually quite good in quality; the problem is that there are too many overly marketing and over-packaged projects on the market. When considering this, one must be critically minded. I personally hold some promising POW coins and also allocate some POS tokens I trust. That’s how the market works—progressing dialectically.