This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaNomad
· 23h ago
Haha, 280M FDV is all? Early NFT buyers really paid the "smart contract tax"
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperer
· 12-11 13:58
45 to 280, that price difference is really incredible... The early investors are probably crying while looking at their wallets now.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropGrandpa
· 12-11 13:58
Early bagholders have now all become philanthropists, hilarious
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 12-11 13:57
45m market cap, 280m FDV, this price difference is a bit big, brother.
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42
· 12-11 13:53
Haha, this is exactly my situation last time, really "thanked" by the smart contract.
View OriginalReply0
StableGenius
· 12-11 13:51
ah the classic "strategic allocation" that turns into a tax write-off. $280M FDV on $45M market cap... empirically speaking, that's just math waiting to get humbled. but yeah, the NFT early adopters always find out the hard way—protocol doing you favors you never asked for lol
$CYS current market cap? $45M. Fully diluted valuation? $280M.
If you grabbed those NFTs early on... well, let's just say the protocol appreciated your generosity more than your wallet did.
Funny how it works—you think you're making a strategic play, but somewhere in the smart contract, it got reclassified as a donation receipt.
Lesson learned. On to the next one.