A certain cat-themed token racks up millions of eyeballs across social platforms, yet somehow triggers content warnings when the account barely hits 20k followers? The logic doesn't add up.
Still not letting go of my bag though. Some things are worth holding through the noise.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConsensusBot
· 12-14 00:48
ngl, the platform's review logic is really ridiculous; having more followers has become a talisman? LOL
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 12-13 10:42
The platform is really funny, with millions of traffic yet still getting warnings? The algorithm is probably fed by something bad. But I still hold on, some things just need to be endured.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 12-12 12:46
Funny... Million-level traffic but got warnings, while small accounts are fine. This platform is really ridiculous haha
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 12-12 04:26
ngl, the platform's censorship logic is really absurd, with fewer fans actually being suppressed? That's hilarious... But on the other hand, I still refuse to let go; some things just have to be endured.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 12-11 02:02
The algorithmic logic indeed has issues. This kind of content warning mechanism seems like waving a big stick around in the mempool without actual discrimination. I agree with the position strategy; arbitrage opportunities are often hidden within this noise.
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCritic
· 12-11 01:59
The platform's algorithm is truly insane; millions of traffic but warns you, 20k followers and you're banned? Where does this data-driven logic make sense...
But on the other hand, I still hold on tightly. Good projects are worth enduring the noise period.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMiner
· 12-11 01:56
Speaking of which, this platform's algorithm is really amazing. Having fewer followers actually results in stricter management? I'm just curious.
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacy
· 12-11 01:52
the content warning threshold mechanics here are arguably exhibiting some non-trivial externalities worth unpacking. historical precedent suggests platforms weaponize moderation asymmetrically, but tbh the sub-optimal incentive structures around viral cat tokens probably deserve deeper scrutiny than they're getting
Reply0
Rugpull幸存者
· 12-11 01:44
Platform warnings have nothing to do with popularity; it's just arbitrary sanctions. I've seen too many of these tactics.
A certain cat-themed token racks up millions of eyeballs across social platforms, yet somehow triggers content warnings when the account barely hits 20k followers? The logic doesn't add up.
Still not letting go of my bag though. Some things are worth holding through the noise.