#ZEC , a blockchain intelligence firm, just dropped a bombshell: they have successfully tracked down the entities behind almost half of all Zcash activity. That's right—the privacy coin that's supposed to protect transaction privacy is now much less opaque.
They claim that over half of Zcash transactions (specifically, 53%) have been tagged with identifiable labels. They attributed an astonishing ( billion in transaction volume to specific entities. Nearly half of all inputs and outputs—48%—can now be traced back to known participants. They also marked 37% of the total balance, roughly $2.5 billion, as being held in wallets they can identify.
This revelation raises serious questions. If a privacy-focused cryptocurrency can be de-anonymized to this extent, what does that say about the broader promise of financial privacy in crypto? Are we witnessing the limits of current privacy tech, or just the beginning of even more sophisticated tracking methods?
For users who specifically chose Zcash for its anonymity, this may serve as a wake-up call. For regulators and compliance teams, it may be powerful evidence that blockchain forensics is catching up—even with protected transactions. The debate over crypto privacy just became even more compelling.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#ZEC , a blockchain intelligence firm, just dropped a bombshell: they have successfully tracked down the entities behind almost half of all Zcash activity. That's right—the privacy coin that's supposed to protect transaction privacy is now much less opaque.
They claim that over half of Zcash transactions (specifically, 53%) have been tagged with identifiable labels. They attributed an astonishing ( billion in transaction volume to specific entities. Nearly half of all inputs and outputs—48%—can now be traced back to known participants. They also marked 37% of the total balance, roughly $2.5 billion, as being held in wallets they can identify.
This revelation raises serious questions. If a privacy-focused cryptocurrency can be de-anonymized to this extent, what does that say about the broader promise of financial privacy in crypto? Are we witnessing the limits of current privacy tech, or just the beginning of even more sophisticated tracking methods?
For users who specifically chose Zcash for its anonymity, this may serve as a wake-up call. For regulators and compliance teams, it may be powerful evidence that blockchain forensics is catching up—even with protected transactions. The debate over crypto privacy just became even more compelling.