# The Buffett Paradox: Why Crypto's Biggest Skeptic Still Won't Touch It

Warren Buffett calling Bitcoin "rat poison squared" isn't just colorful language — it's his investment philosophy speaking. The Oracle of Omaha has been consistent on one thing: crypto generates zero tangible value.

His 2022 take says it all: "If you owned all Bitcoin on Earth and offered it to me for $25, I wouldn't take it." Why? Because unlike Apple or Coca-Cola, you can't use it to build something or generate cash flow. It's just a token you'd have to sell to someone else — and that someone is betting on the next person paying more.

Yet here's the twist: Berkshire quietly invested $750 million into Nu Holdings, a Brazilian fintech with a crypto arm. So Buffett's playing both sides?

Not really. He's investing in the *banking infrastructure*, not the coin itself. That's the difference.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin's up 30% since Trump's election win, merchants are adopting digital payments, and crypto sentiment is riding high again. Classic cycle: hype peaks, fundamentals don't follow, Buffett stays on the sidelines.

The question isn't whether Buffett's right — it's whether you're betting on crypto's *technology* or just the next rally.