So the beer gets covered by transaction fees? That's actually a pretty solid tokenomics feature right there.

BEER-0,71%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
liquiditea_sippervip
· 2025-11-21 23:00
This tokenomics design is quite something, as the transaction fees have become a point for value capture.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractWorkervip
· 2025-11-20 20:43
Haha, the transaction fee pays for the beer, this tokenomics design is indeed a bit awesome.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLickervip
· 2025-11-19 17:47
Haha, that's great, this way it has become real Liquidity Mining, I like it.
View OriginalReply0
ConfusedWhalevip
· 2025-11-19 04:29
Huh? This logic is reversed, beer is covered by the fees? Isn't that backwards?
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPuddingvip
· 2025-11-19 04:28
Haha, okay, I like this way of Clip Coupons.
View OriginalReply0
fren.ethvip
· 2025-11-19 04:27
Haha, I never thought of it from this angle, the gas fee has instead become a buying pressure? That's quite amazing.
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpertvip
· 2025-11-19 04:08
Haha, that's alright. This tokenomics design really has something to it.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecoveryvip
· 2025-11-19 04:01
lol "solid tokenomics" – classic cope. watched this exact pattern play out three times already. fees eating into utility? that's not a feature, that's just... taxation with extra steps. mark my words, six months from now we're gonna see the post-mortem on why nobody actually used it.
Reply0
  • Pin