Something worth noting about certain lending markets: when curators share liquidity pools, the riskiest curator's decisions can drag down everyone else's strategies. That's the tradeoff with shared liquidity models—one bad actor impacts the whole ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVSandwichVictim
· 11-10 23:26
Share a cup of tea and don't forget, we sink together.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoNomics
· 11-10 18:57
*sigh* classic prisoner's dilemma in nash equilibrium framework. run the regression, p<0.001
Reply0
TideReceder
· 11-10 06:48
Retail investors still haven't run... Just lying flat and waiting to die.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiHarvester
· 11-10 01:31
Lose everything together, might as well wait for death together.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizard
· 11-08 00:18
I was so scared that I hugged my wallet and trembled.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaSunglasses
· 11-08 00:18
Risk sharing is really exciting
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 11-08 00:15
Another market collapsed due to greed
View OriginalReply0
MondayYoloFridayCry
· 11-08 00:06
The blood and tears of old suckers serve as a lesson.
Something worth noting about certain lending markets: when curators share liquidity pools, the riskiest curator's decisions can drag down everyone else's strategies. That's the tradeoff with shared liquidity models—one bad actor impacts the whole ecosystem.