Introduction: Investment Comparison of SFI vs LRC
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Singularity Finance (SFI) and Loopring (LRC) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset space.
Singularity Finance (SFI): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its focus on AI-centric blockchain solutions and tokenization of the AI value chain.
Loopring (LRC): Introduced in 2017, it has been hailed as a pioneer in decentralized exchange protocols, offering zero-risk token exchange models on Ethereum.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between SFI and LRC, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question investors care about most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
Singularity Finance (SFI) and Loopring (LRC) Historical Price Trends
- 2025: SFI reached its all-time high of $0.135 on February 19, 2025.
- 2021: LRC hit its all-time high of $3.75 on November 10, 2021, during the overall crypto market bull run.
- Comparative analysis: In the recent market cycle, SFI dropped from its high of $0.135 to a low of $0.01075, while LRC declined from $3.75 to its current price of $0.056, representing a more significant percentage decrease.
Current Market Situation (2025-11-25)
- SFI current price: $0.01105
- LRC current price: $0.056
- 24-hour trading volume: SFI $13,747.12 vs LRC $89,500.55
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 19 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

SFI vs LRC Investment Value Analysis
I. Comparative Analysis of Core Factors
Supply Mechanism Comparison (Tokenomics)
- SFI: Integrates DeFi and AI with a self-adjusting mechanism tied to market dynamics
- SYNC Network: Implements a deflation model where tokens are burned when crypto bonds are created
- 📌 Historical Pattern: Supply mechanisms that incorporate burn/deflationary models tend to support price stability during market volatility
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional Holdings: Limited data available for both tokens
- Enterprise Applications: SFI offers potential in merging DeFi capabilities with AI applications
- Regulatory Stance: Both tokens operate within the broader DeFi regulatory framework which continues to evolve globally
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- SFI Technical Development: Focuses on integrating AI capabilities with decentralized finance applications
- SYNC Network Development: Emphasizes liquidity provision mechanisms through crypto bonds and Uniswap pairing
- Ecosystem Comparison: SFI appears to target AI-enhanced DeFi services while SYNC focuses on liquidity stability
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Inflation Performance: Insufficient data to determine anti-inflationary properties
- Monetary Policy Impact: Both tokens likely subject to broader crypto market reactions to interest rate changes
- Geopolitical Factors: Cross-border transaction utility remains theoretical for both tokens in current development stages
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: SFI vs LRC
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- SFI: Conservative $0.00663 - $0.01105 | Optimistic $0.01105 - $0.0158015
- LRC: Conservative $0.0520149 - $0.05593 | Optimistic $0.05593 - $0.0665567
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- SFI may enter a growth phase, with expected price range of $0.0151496163 - $0.0224747055
- LRC may enter a steady growth phase, with expected price range of $0.03959995011 - $0.08309497728
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- SFI: Base scenario $0.023324719671922 - $0.024813531565875 | Optimistic scenario $0.024813531565875 - $0.026550478775486
- LRC: Base scenario $0.078379062067247 - $0.084278561362632 | Optimistic scenario $0.084278561362632 - $0.123046699589442
View detailed price predictions for SFI and LRC
Disclaimer: The above predictions are based on historical data and market analysis. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and subject to change. This information should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
SFI:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.0158015 |
0.01105 |
0.00663 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.01987011 |
0.01342575 |
0.0130229775 |
21 |
| 2027 |
0.0224747055 |
0.01664793 |
0.0151496163 |
50 |
| 2028 |
0.02660339214 |
0.01956131775 |
0.0134973092475 |
77 |
| 2029 |
0.02654470818675 |
0.023082354945 |
0.02054329590105 |
108 |
| 2030 |
0.026550478775486 |
0.024813531565875 |
0.023324719671922 |
124 |
LRC:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.0665567 |
0.05593 |
0.0520149 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.068592552 |
0.06124335 |
0.0471573795 |
9 |
| 2027 |
0.08309497728 |
0.064917951 |
0.03959995011 |
15 |
| 2028 |
0.0799269812712 |
0.07400646414 |
0.0599452359534 |
32 |
| 2029 |
0.091590400019664 |
0.0769667227056 |
0.060803710937424 |
37 |
| 2030 |
0.123046699589442 |
0.084278561362632 |
0.078379062067247 |
50 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: SFI vs LRC
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategy
- SFI: Suitable for investors focused on AI-enhanced DeFi applications and ecosystem potential
- LRC: Suitable for investors interested in decentralized exchange protocols and Ethereum-based solutions
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: SFI 20% vs LRC 80%
- Aggressive investors: SFI 60% vs LRC 40%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolio
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- SFI: Higher volatility due to newer market entry and smaller market cap
- LRC: Exposure to overall Ethereum ecosystem performance and DeFi market trends
Technical Risk
- SFI: Scalability, network stability in integrating AI with blockchain
- LRC: Smart contract vulnerabilities, potential scalability issues on Ethereum
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may impact both tokens differently, with DeFi protocols potentially facing increased scrutiny
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- SFI advantages: AI integration potential, newer technology with growth prospects
- LRC advantages: Established presence in DEX protocols, Ethereum ecosystem integration
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a balanced approach with a slight bias towards LRC for its more established market presence
- Experienced investors: Explore a higher allocation to SFI for potential growth, while maintaining LRC for stability
- Institutional investors: Conduct thorough due diligence on both projects, with a focus on SFI's AI integration potential and LRC's established ecosystem
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and this article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between SFI and LRC?
A: SFI focuses on AI-centric blockchain solutions and tokenization of the AI value chain, while LRC is a pioneer in decentralized exchange protocols on Ethereum. SFI is newer with a smaller market cap, while LRC has a more established presence in the DeFi ecosystem.
Q2: Which token has performed better historically?
A: LRC reached its all-time high of $3.75 in November 2021, while SFI's all-time high was $0.135 in February 2025. However, LRC has experienced a more significant percentage decrease from its peak compared to SFI.
Q3: What are the key factors influencing the future price of SFI and LRC?
A: Key factors include institutional capital inflow, potential ETF approvals, ecosystem development, integration of AI capabilities (for SFI), and the overall performance of the Ethereum ecosystem (for LRC).
Q4: How do the supply mechanisms of SFI and LRC compare?
A: SFI integrates DeFi and AI with a self-adjusting mechanism tied to market dynamics, while LRC's supply mechanism is not specifically mentioned in the provided information.
Q5: What are the main risks associated with investing in SFI and LRC?
A: Both tokens face market risks due to crypto volatility. SFI has higher volatility due to its newer market entry and smaller market cap. Technical risks include scalability and network stability for SFI, and smart contract vulnerabilities for LRC. Both face regulatory risks as global policies towards DeFi evolve.
Q6: How should investors allocate their portfolio between SFI and LRC?
A: Conservative investors might consider 20% SFI and 80% LRC, while aggressive investors could opt for 60% SFI and 40% LRC. New investors may want a balanced approach with a slight bias towards LRC, while experienced investors could explore a higher allocation to SFI for potential growth.
Q7: What are the long-term price predictions for SFI and LRC by 2030?
A: For SFI, the base scenario predicts $0.023324719671922 - $0.024813531565875, with an optimistic scenario of $0.024813531565875 - $0.026550478775486. For LRC, the base scenario predicts $0.078379062067247 - $0.084278561362632, with an optimistic scenario of $0.084278561362632 - $0.123046699589442.