GateUser-57ab9c02

Recently, I came across a bunch of screenshots of LSTs and re-staking again. The returns look pretty attractive, but my first reaction is still: where does the money come from, and who bears the risk? Honestly, many times it's just breaking the same staking security into several "notes" for circulation. The more it circulates, the more complex it gets—fees, incentives, and the expectations of later participants taking over are all involved. The extra gains you get might be from protocol subsidies or risk premiums.
As a lone wolf, I find the authorization process even more annoying: putting LST

Recently, I've seen everyone talking about AI Agents automatically running on the blockchain, which is quite tempting, but I still don't dare to fully let go... To be honest, just because it can click buttons doesn't mean it can take the blame for you. When signing, someone must be watching: who exactly is being authorized, for how long, is it unlimited, don't accidentally give the "key" to strangers. Also, before contract interactions, address verification, whether the domain is phishing, whether the transaction simulation results have strange outputs—these agents, no matter how smart, can st

Recently, I've seen people interpret ETF capital flows and the risk appetite in the US stock market together, casually saying "on-chain is about to take off," which makes me a bit nervous... Anyway, I feel like when I work with AMM, it's more like watching a curve demanding payment from me. When the price moves, the position automatically shifts into a loss, and impermanent loss isn't just scare tactics; it's really like you think you're stacking coins, but in reality, you're passively selling off or getting caught in a slippage. Earning fees is nice, but don't think of it as easy money, espec