Does DAO voting really mean "everyone makes the decisions together"?

I now see it more as a description of a power structure: who proposes, who can change the rules, where the voting rights come from, who receives the incentives... these details are more honest than slogans. Recently, everyone has been discussing rate cut expectations, the US dollar index, risk assets sometimes rising together and sometimes falling together, emotions wave after wave, but I think proposals will be more calm—no matter how loud the macro noise is, the on-chain "who gets more votes, who is fed more sugar" direction tends to be more stable.
A bear market is suitable for doing this, reading slowly, remembering slowly, don’t rush to pick a side.