Recently, I've seen projects on RWA going viral for being on the chain, claiming that on-chain liquidity is better. At first, I was curious too, but after clicking in, I realized that "liquidity" often just means a lively secondary pool; when it comes to redemption, you still have to look at the terms: T+ days, quota limits, and in extreme cases, the ability to pause... Honestly, it's not the same as the idea of buying and selling at will.



I’ve already fallen into a pit once before (not really a pit, more like paying tuition). I didn’t understand the redemption rules but rushed in anyway, and when I wanted to withdraw, I found I had to queue + wait for a window period. The price didn’t drop much, but my mindset collapsed first. Later, I set a rule for myself: if I don’t understand the redemption terms, I won’t move; better to miss out.

By the way, recently, everyone has been speculating whether projects will migrate before and after the main public chain upgrades. I also got a bit anxious... but thinking about whether to migrate or not doesn’t matter much to me. What I fear most is the appearance of being able to exit at any time, but actually being unable to. For now, I’ll keep watching as an observer.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin