The matter of robots going on the blockchain, @StrikeRobot_ai team explained it quite clearly. Simply put, robots are no longer just performing tasks; they can settle transactions themselves, trade independently, and make payments on their own.

The current issue is that robot technology is already very mature—robots can inspect factories, deliver goods, perform surgeries—but they cannot directly participate in economic activities.
If two robots want to exchange data, human approval is still required in the middle; even if a robot earns money, it cannot reinvest on its own. Essentially, they are still tools, not independent economic actors.
Strike Robot’s solution is to put robots on the blockchain, using four fundamental capabilities to change the current situation: verifiable identity, direct data transmission, direct transfer of value, and executable rules.
This way, different manufacturers and different types of robots can collaborate directly without human intermediaries.
Why did they choose the Base chain? Several practical reasons:
First, it’s low cost—microtransactions between robots, such as buying sensor data, only require a few cents in transaction fees. Ethereum mainnet can’t handle this kind of scenario.
Second, Base provides a verifiable execution environment—what code the robots run, what decisions they make, all are recorded on-chain, making audits and insurance straightforward.
Third, the ecosystem is already quite complete—Virtuals Protocol handles tokenized financing, Coinbase provides fiat channels, and connecting with enterprise clients is also convenient.
Strike Robot is already working on deploying humanoid robots, initiating payments autonomously, settling bills, recording decisions on-chain.
In the next year, it all depends on which team can first establish a complete economic closed loop. Whoever does it first will be able to define the industry standard.
The infrastructure is basically in place; now it’s just about execution.
@StrikeRobot_ai