Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, people have been talking about LST and re-staking again. To put it simply, the main source of returns isn't just falling from the sky: one part is the basic yield from consensus mechanisms plus MEV profits, and the other part is more about "people willing to pay for security/liquidity," such as new services, various points, subsidies... It sounds quite attractive, but after watching the mempool for a while, I develop a bit of a professional bias: where does the money come from? Someone will eventually have to pay.
The risks are also quite straightforward: the underlying staking already involves penalties, confiscations, or node failures. Re-staking is like taking the same collateral and stacking more promises on top, which increases the correlation. When a chain of liquidations or protocol failures happen, slippage can really catch people off guard. Recently, on the L2 side, there's been chatter about TPS, fees, and ecosystem subsidies. I actually react a bit slowly to these... I just look at on-chain congestion and transaction quality. Whether there are many subsidies or not isn't something I calculate much. Anyway, I prefer to keep leverage and expectations low to sleep soundly.