Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Been seeing a lot of quantum panic in the feeds lately, so worth breaking down what's actually at risk here. A new report from CoinShares basically argues we're way overblowing the immediate threat, and the numbers back it up.
So here's the thing: everyone throws around these scary numbers saying 20-50% of bitcoin could eventually be vulnerable to quantum attacks. Sounds terrifying until you dig into what that actually means. CoinShares looked specifically at the legacy P2PK addresses where public keys are just sitting there on-chain, easier to target if quantum computers ever get strong enough. They estimate around 1.6 million BTC lives in these older address types, which is roughly 8% of total supply.
But here's where it gets interesting. That 1.6 million BTC isn't concentrated in a handful of massive wallets waiting to get cracked. It's scattered across more than 32,000 separate chunks, averaging about 50 BTC each. For a quantum attacker to actually cause real market disruption, they'd need to steal enough coins in one go to move the needle. CoinShares puts that threshold at around 10,200 BTC. Everything else? Too fragmented to be worth the effort.
The technical side is also way less urgent than the hype suggests. Breaking bitcoin's cryptography would require fault-tolerant quantum systems roughly 100,000 times more powerful than today's best machines. We're talking at least a decade out, probably longer. Google's Willow chip is 105 qubits—key-breaking would need millions.
Instead of treating this like an emergency, the real play is a gradual migration to post-quantum signatures. BIP-360 and similar proposals are already being discussed to let users transition smoothly without forcing everyone at once. It's an engineering problem to solve over time, not a crisis hitting tomorrow.
Price action's been choppy though. Bitcoin briefly hit $76,000 but couldn't hold it, now sitting around $74,000. Funding rates on perpetuals have been negative for weeks despite rising open interest, which signals people are still pretty bearish. Quantum fears are definitely creeping back into the narrative as investors hunt for reasons to be cautious, but the actual risk profile is way smaller than the discourse makes it sound.