Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
AI is making traditional CEO credentials less convincing
By the time Bryan Buck starts talking about “agility,” it is tempting to file the word away with familiar corporate abstractions like innovation and transformation. But listen closely to how the managing partner at executive search firm ON Partners uses it, and it becomes clear he is describing something far more concrete and disruptive to the traditional CEO ladder.
Recommended Video
Agility, Buck argues, is the new operating system for leadership. In the AI era, boards are beginning to hire for it with urgency as the signals that once defined executive readiness start to weaken and the cost of a bad leadership bet rises.
The result is a shifting reality in C-suite selection. Leaders are being rewarded for speed, experimentation, and AI fluency while being penalized for hype, overreach, and the executive equivalent of hallucination, he says.
While the traditional CEO model built on tenure, institutional knowledge, and linear career progression still exists, Buck says, it is no longer the primary filter. Directors are asking a different question: Who can learn, adapt, and pressure-test decisions quickly as the rules of business continue to change?
Boards are focusing less on years served and more on what actually happened during a leader’s tenure. Did they scale something meaningful? Did they navigate a structural shift? Did they demonstrate judgment under pressure?
AI enters the conversation not as a technical requirement, but as a force that compresses the time over which past experience remains useful. When the rules of an industry change mid-game, says Buck, the person who has played the old version the longest is not necessarily the best player.
Still, although companies want leaders who move decisively on AI, they are increasingly wary of those who move recklessly. Buck says the strongest executives are not just talking about AI in broad terms; they are actively experimenting with it and using it to inform decisions. Tools such as Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT are becoming strategic sounding boards that compress iteration cycles. Questions that once required a multi-day offsite can now be explored in minutes. In Buck’s framing, agility shows up as learning velocity, adaptability, and the willingness to test ideas quickly.
The same acceleration exposes a second leadership trait: discernment. Buck points to a familiar archetype of the executive who announces that a 2,000-person IT organization will shrink to 20 employees because automation will handle everything. That kind of claim may grab attention, but it often collapses when operational reality sets in. Strong leaders roll out AI in stages, building momentum without overpromising results.
This is where the demand for “AI-fluent” executives becomes more practical than technical. Most future CEOs will not write code. For Buck, AI fluency means experimenting early, building intuition, and turning that learning into business results. The focus should be on credible gains in areas such as finance automation, forecasting, earnings preparation, and customer support, not the illusion that AI will replace entire functions overnight.
Because nearly every executive now claims to use AI, Buck admits that interview signals are getting noisy. As a result, boards and executive recruiters are approaching the topic indirectly by asking candidates about moments when they took unconventional risks, what failed, and what they learned. Leaders who talk candidly about their losses often reveal stronger judgment and resilience, he says. Those qualities translate well to the AI era, even when the story itself has nothing to do with AI.
Ruth Umoh
ruth.umoh@fortune.com
Smarter in seconds
**Weekend warrior. **Billionaire chipmaker CEO Lisa Su holds meetings on weekends and sends feedback after midnight because leaders aren’t born: ‘They’re trained’
Labor lurch. Joseph Stiglitz says buckle up before the great AI ‘reallocation’ era arrives
**Bullseye bounceback. **Target’s new CEO lays out a $6 billion plan to revive ‘Tarzhay’
Leadership lesson
Nike CEO Elliott Hill on how he’s maintaining contracts and relationships with sports superstars: “I try to send little notes to athletes just so they know that I’m watching what’s happening in their world.”
News to know
Wall Street is betting the war with Iran will drag on, pushing oil prices higher as Trump holds off on tapping emergency reserves. Fortune
SpaceX would need Berkshire-level profits to justify a $1.5 trillion IPO valuation—an unlikely outcome. Fortune
An OpenAI robotics leader resigned over the company’s Pentagon deal and concerns about surveillance and autonomous weapons. Fortune
OpenAI and Anthropic are turning to major consulting firms to help companies more deeply embed AI into their operations. WSJ
Iran has named Mojtaba Khamenei supreme leader after his father was killed in U.S.-Israeli strikes, signaling continuity rather than retreat. NYT
**Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit **May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.