Not invested in Cookie myself, yet can't shake the feeling that their current approach isn't exactly fair to the community. Users deserve better consideration here. Really hoping this gets enough visibility to prompt the team to reconsider their stance. Sometimes it takes public feedback to spark meaningful change.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 8h ago
Ha, it's the same old story... No matter how loud the community's voice is, the team might not listen.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 8h ago
honestly, if you've actually run the numbers on cookie's tokenomics vs their liquidity pool dynamics, the fee structure becomes mathematically indefensible. basis points matter, and theirs don't add up.
Reply0
DAOTruant
· 8h ago
Alright, Cookie, this move is indeed a bit shady. The community's demands are so obvious, and you're still pretending not to see them?
Not invested in Cookie myself, yet can't shake the feeling that their current approach isn't exactly fair to the community. Users deserve better consideration here. Really hoping this gets enough visibility to prompt the team to reconsider their stance. Sometimes it takes public feedback to spark meaningful change.