Whether it's military annexation or financial acquisition, both approaches highlight a deeper issue: fiscal insolvency. The U.S. carries $38.6 trillion in national debt—and that figure excludes unfunded liabilities that dwarf the headline number by orders of magnitude. In a rational financial framework, the question isn't whether to acquire additional assets, but how to service existing obligations that are already unsustainable. Borrowing fresh capital for major acquisitions when the balance sheet is hemorrhaging makes little economic sense. This scenario underscores how debt-constrained economies face impossible trade-offs: expansion requires capital that's increasingly expensive to borrow, yet doing nothing guarantees deteriorating fiscal dynamics over time.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlphaBrain
· 1h ago
$38.6 trillion? That number has long ceased to scare us; players are used to it.
---
A typical vicious cycle—borrowing to expand or sitting and waiting to die, both are uncomfortable.
---
Honestly, there's no way out, and that's the most terrifying part.
---
Nah, they still have the money-printing machine; they won't really go bankrupt.
---
An astronomical amount of debt, yet still thinking about acquisitions and expansion? That mindset is a bit ridiculous.
---
Instead of discussing these, it's better to look at how on-chain assets are allocated... at least the rules are clear there.
---
The US debt game has long been a dead end; they're just delaying now.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketGardener
· 2h ago
This debt black hole is getting deeper and deeper. The old tricks of the US empire of playing left hand against right hand are no longer working...
---
Borrowing new debt to pay off old debt, is this what you call financial innovation? The end result is inflation consuming everything.
---
The 38.6 trillion is just the visible debt; hidden debts are even more terrifying. Anyway, ordinary people will foot the bill.
---
Wanting both expansion and debt clearance—this illusion of getting the best of both worlds will eventually shatter.
---
This logic is clearly heading into a dead end. The era of printing money to solve everything is truly over.
---
Expansion or stagnation—both are dead ends. That’s the real systemic risk.
---
Hmm... The balance sheet is in such bad shape and you still want to leverage up? Wake up, everyone.
---
Is fiscal bankruptcy a false proposition? Or has it truly arrived? Looking at the current situation, I’m a bit unsettled.
---
In simple terms, there’s not enough time to spend. The more debt you owe, the faster you owe it.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurner
· 2h ago
Is the time to short the US dollar coming? On-chain data shows high-net-worth addresses are building positions in BTC. This wave might really be happening.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 2h ago
38.6 trillion is just the surface, hidden debts are the real bomb, right?
---
Typical living paycheck to paycheck, still expanding now—really a gambler's mentality.
---
Is this called "keep borrowing when you can't pay back"? That's self-deception.
---
When it comes to debt, someone has to pay the piper in the end—let's see who it is.
---
The balance sheet is already in such a loss, and you're still messing around—what's the logic?
---
Basically, there's no courage for a hard landing; you can only keep blowing up the balloon.
---
Doing nothing will worsen the situation, but continuing to act is also dead... There’s no standard answer to this.
---
How long can the game of borrowing new debt to pay old debt last? Really want to see the endgame.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiary
· 2h ago
Haha, 38.6 trillion is just the tip of the iceberg; the true black hole is in the unliquidated liabilities... This is a classic debt trap— the more you try to turn things around, the deeper you fall into the pit.
The logic of being foolish and having money— even when unable to repay debts— still pushing for acquisitions... Surface-level growth is meaningless.
This system should have been reconstructed long ago, but unfortunately, no one dares to move.
Expansion or decline, one must choose— there's really no other option... It's a bit hopeless.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxOpener
· 2h ago
Speaking of the 38.6 trillion figure, it makes my head hurt just hearing it, I can't even imagine... The debt black hole keeps getting deeper, is it really only going to restart after the system collapses?
Whether it's military annexation or financial acquisition, both approaches highlight a deeper issue: fiscal insolvency. The U.S. carries $38.6 trillion in national debt—and that figure excludes unfunded liabilities that dwarf the headline number by orders of magnitude. In a rational financial framework, the question isn't whether to acquire additional assets, but how to service existing obligations that are already unsustainable. Borrowing fresh capital for major acquisitions when the balance sheet is hemorrhaging makes little economic sense. This scenario underscores how debt-constrained economies face impossible trade-offs: expansion requires capital that's increasingly expensive to borrow, yet doing nothing guarantees deteriorating fiscal dynamics over time.