The storage service ecosystem is redefining token value. Taking Walrus as an example, its core innovation lies in linking storage fees with a token burn mechanism—whenever users generate storage needs, a portion of the corresponding fee is directly used to burn WAL tokens.
What's interesting about this design? As the ecosystem's storage usage increases, the circulating supply of tokens actually decreases gradually. In other words, the more people use the ecosystem, the scarcer the tokens become. This is not just simple halving; it’s a deflation driven by real-world application—higher fees lead to more burns, tightening the supply.
For long-term holders, this means the token weight in your hands is quietly increasing. The token's value is no longer floating in the air but is deeply tied to the actual usage of the ecosystem. Ecosystem prosperity → increased storage demand → fee accumulation → accelerated token burns → increased scarcity. Once this positive feedback loop starts, it’s hard to stop.
Of course, the sustainability of this mechanism depends on whether the ecosystem can truly attract users and storage demand. But from a design perspective, it indeed provides holders with a tangible value support.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
quiet_lurker
· 5h ago
This logic is indeed brilliant; the more you use it, the more valuable the tokens become.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamer
· 5h ago
Wow, this logic is really clever. The more you use it, the fewer tokens you have? Now that's what I call true value support.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiac
· 5h ago
Sounds good, but it depends on whether the ecosystem can truly retain users. There have been enough lessons from history.
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFish
· 5h ago
Using fee burning to drive deflation is indeed a brilliant logic.
Walrus's mechanism bets on the ecosystem truly gaining momentum; otherwise, it's just an appealing story.
I agree that practical application drives > mechanism drives.
However, the real test is still about who can come out first.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 5h ago
Haha, this is true deflation, not just talk.
Damn, finally a project that ties tokens to real applications.
But the key is still having users, otherwise it's just armchair strategizing.
This logic is indeed brilliant; the more you use it, the scarcer it becomes. Clever.
I'm optimistic about Walrus; let's see if it can gain traction later on.
Wait, does that mean early investors are going to make a killing?
This feels more like what a token should be—not just air.
Honestly, there's too much fake demand in the crypto world; Walrus is a real thing.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 5h ago
Wow, this is what true deflation looks like, not a cutback show to harvest retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStacker
· 5h ago
Damn, this mechanism is awesome, the more you use it, the more scarce it becomes.
The storage service ecosystem is redefining token value. Taking Walrus as an example, its core innovation lies in linking storage fees with a token burn mechanism—whenever users generate storage needs, a portion of the corresponding fee is directly used to burn WAL tokens.
What's interesting about this design? As the ecosystem's storage usage increases, the circulating supply of tokens actually decreases gradually. In other words, the more people use the ecosystem, the scarcer the tokens become. This is not just simple halving; it’s a deflation driven by real-world application—higher fees lead to more burns, tightening the supply.
For long-term holders, this means the token weight in your hands is quietly increasing. The token's value is no longer floating in the air but is deeply tied to the actual usage of the ecosystem. Ecosystem prosperity → increased storage demand → fee accumulation → accelerated token burns → increased scarcity. Once this positive feedback loop starts, it’s hard to stop.
Of course, the sustainability of this mechanism depends on whether the ecosystem can truly attract users and storage demand. But from a design perspective, it indeed provides holders with a tangible value support.