Interesting things just happened.



Someone was looking at the monthly Bollinger Bands and noticed that Bitcoin's price was forming a series of consecutive bearish divergences at the upper band, and now it has returned near the midline. The logic is straightforward—continue to explore the bottom, and entering a deep bear market is highly probable. The entire analysis sounds flawless.

But then someone else presented an entirely opposite view. This person pointed out: you initially assumed that the cycle was about to end, constrained by the traditional 4-year cycle theory, and completely failed to see the true business cycle.

He pulled out historical data to prove his point: whenever this indicator first tests the important midline, Bitcoin tends to hit new all-time highs afterward. He also added a very insightful note—divergence phenomena are everywhere in trading, followed by sharp pullbacks forming higher lows (like this 80k retracement), then continuing to rise strongly. There are so many examples you can't count them.

The same indicator can tell two completely opposite stories.

Think about why this happens. The fundamental reason is actually very simple: everyone already has a path in mind, and then they look for reasons that support that path. This is a common mental trap. You look at data with a preset mindset, and naturally, you find angles that support it.

Of course, we cannot deny that 2026 will indeed bring many challenges and uncertainties. The good news is that once this year truly passes, we will have a brand new data sample. This will be very important for improving trend analysis methods and refining trading systems.
BTC-0,14%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropFreedomvip
· 5h ago
Basically, everyone has their own reasoning; no matter how you look at the data, you can always spin a story. How should I put it, we'll know when 2026 arrives. There's no point arguing now. The Bollinger Bands stuff is a double-edged sword; it depends on how you use it. I'm already tired of divergence; things that keep recurring have little reference value. What can historical data prove? The next cycle will still crash; don't believe it? Just look. Actually, everyone already knows in their own mind before looking for evidence; it's no secret anymore. Instead of obsessing over indicators, it's better to wait and see what truly happens in 2026—that will be the real test.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValuevip
· 5h ago
Laughing out loud, it's the daily routine of the same candlestick with two different interpretations Divergence traders vs. cycle believers, always contradicting each other Wait, let's see who shows next year's report card first? Data can lie, but wallets don't deceive That's why I only learn from risk management masters, not from analysts
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e19e9c10vip
· 5h ago
Basically, everyone has their own narrative. Data itself is always neutral; it's people who can never be clear.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)