2026-01-12 03:35:28

South Korea's recent decision to loosen its crypto ban on enterprises seems like a local move, but it actually reflects a larger shift in the global landscape.

Looking back over the past few years, regulatory authorities in various countries have generally followed a similar approach—cryptocurrency assets are something we don't understand well, and they carry significant risks, so let's keep them out of the financial system first. It's that simple and crude.

But now, it's clear that the tide is turning. The era of outright bans is receding, replaced by what? Limited opening with strong regulation. This is not just a South Korean issue; the entire world is adjusting its stance in sync. What does this change mean? It's worth pondering.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SocialFiQueen

· 22h ago

The trend has indeed changed. The ban has loosened, Korea is the first to take the lead, and many others will follow suit. Regulators have figured it out: it's better to regulate lightly than to block entirely. If there's money to be made, who would really ban everything? The previous approach of "we don't understand, so we ban everything" now seems like a joke. Wait, does this mean institutions are really about to enter the market on a large scale? Here they come, the whole world is rewriting the rules. Is the spring of Web3 finally here? Basically, it's gone from "get out" to "pay your taxes honestly." Governments' treasuries are going crazy. This pace feels like it's paving the way for some major moves. Korea dares to loosen restrictions, other countries can't sit still, and a chain reaction is about to begin. Once the regulatory framework is in place, retail investors will have to learn the rules again, and this time it might be even more complicated.

View OriginalReply0

degenwhisperer

· 01-12 04:01

Finally someone sees clearly, regulation is really shifting, it's not just a Korean thing Speaking of which, the "limited loosening" under strict regulation sounds like playing with words; how it will actually be implemented remains a big question mark This wave feels off... it seems like paving the way for certain institutions, retail investors still need to watch out Is the beginning of compromise still a long-term positive? I for one am holding steady Regulatory authorities have finally realized they can't block it anymore, this is getting interesting To put it simply, the attitude has changed from "get out" to "come in but behave," it feels like the bigger picture is changing The biggest fear now is this nominal loosening, only to turn around and come up with a new trick

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 01-12 04:00

Ah, from "ban with a single stroke" to "limited opening," it really feels like the paper tiger has been exposed. The previous logic of "ban if you don't understand" was indeed absurd. Now, shifting the approach actually tests each country's true capabilities. This wave of synchronized global adjustments feels like being forced to bow or proactively change course; it depends on how the subsequent flow of real money unfolds. South Korea's move wasn't particularly early, but it definitely gave the entire market a boost of confidence. Regulation changing from enemy to ally—only then are we truly survivors. Instead of obsessing over bans, it's better to focus on how they are taxing—this is the real key. It seems that countries are now afraid of missing the opportunity and are starting to "awaken" collectively. The tough regulatory approach is basically just a different way of cutting; everyone shouldn't be fooled by the words "relax." It feels like the entire landscape is being reshaped, but who the real winners are is still uncertain. After all these moves, the real beneficiaries are probably those projects with licenses. Synchronized adjustments may seem easy, but can every country be equally greedy?

View OriginalReply0

governance_lurker

· 01-12 03:57

Finally, someone has seen clearly. This wave is really a turning point. Regulatory authorities are also learning to coexist with us. South Korea has taken the lead in loosening restrictions, and a whole series will follow. Instead of deadlock, better to regulate properly; everyone with common sense understands this logic. Hold on, could this "strict regulation" be another new way to squeeze out the market? The trend has indeed changed, but is this truly openness or just a new tactic to cut profits? Let's wait and see which country will follow suit next. Basically, they just can't resist anymore; reality has taught them. This game of chess is now a test of each country's bottom line. Very interesting.

View OriginalReply0

MagicBean

· 01-12 03:54

Whoa, are all countries finally waking up? The previously rigid defenses are gradually loosening, which is quite interesting. It's really gone from "Get lost" to "Don't cause trouble for now, let's talk about the rules." This kind of shift hasn't happened overnight. Wait, is the loosening of regulation truly relaxed, or is it just a new way to cut the leeks? We need to see subsequent actions. As the global pace adjusts together, does it feel like crypto is finally entering a "normal" track? Honestly, they probably just can't resist anymore, and regulating it might just be a way to collect some taxes. This is the real gameplay. South Korea making this move will surely inspire other countries to follow suit. But when it comes to strict regulation, it probably isn't that "strict" after all; everyone is still doing their own thing. It seems that policy trends often follow market conditions with a delay. Hmm, so here's the question: is the real opportunity now, or should we wait until it officially lands?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropGrandpa

· 01-12 03:42

The trend has indeed shifted. The loosening of the ban indicates what? It means they have finally realized they can't block it anymore. South Korea is acting so quickly, other countries need to follow suit, or they'll be left behind. Veterans have long seen this coming; this wave is a transition from confrontation to coexistence. Strict regulation is just a smokescreen; in reality, they just want a share of the pie. If this shift can truly be implemented, it would be incredible. It all depends on how subsequent actions are taken. The compromise has arrived. Countries are all betting on how to play this game of crypto to best serve their national interests. Finally, there's some progress. It's much more reasonable than the previous all-or-nothing approach.

View OriginalReply0