2026-01-11 18:20:21

The crypto world is full of new traders making rookie mistakes every day. The original intention of creating this course is simple—using my own missteps to help others avoid the same pitfalls. To be honest, my trading skills are average, but I’ve stepped into plenty of traps over the years. 298 dollars may not be much, but if it can help you avoid common pitfalls and reduce the chances of getting "scalped," then this investment is worth it. The market is like that—information gaps can cost real money. Instead of figuring everything out on your own, it’s better to listen to the advice of someone who’s been there.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-a5fa8bd0

· 01-11 19:05

I've been through all the pitfalls you've encountered, really, just consider 298 as tuition fees. --- It's the same old routine of cutting leeks, how come they all look the same? --- Information asymmetry is money, there's no way around it. --- Hearing from someone experienced sounds comforting, but I don't know how much to trust. --- You still dare to hold classes with average trading skills? Haha. --- It's indeed cost-effective to avoid getting cut once, I admit. --- The pitfalls in the crypto world are so numerous that it feels impossible to avoid them altogether.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterX

· 01-11 18:50

Why does this course cost 298? You got cut once and now you want to cut others, right?

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterLucky

· 01-11 18:50

You're at it again, trying to harvest the little guys. I wouldn't believe you even if I wanted to. --- I could lose even 298 yuan and end up negative, and I still have to listen to you? --- Sounds nice, but isn't it just about making quick money? --- I've seen this trick too many times... --- Avoid the trap? First, avoid your knife. --- Information asymmetry is really expensive, but what's so expensive about your price? --- The advice from someone who's been through it is: don't trust these courses. --- I just want to ask, how much did you lose before you decided to start the course?

View OriginalReply0

CounterIndicator

· 01-11 18:36

Another new course to cut the leeks, as expected, the crypto world has a new trick every day. I've already been scammed so many times, why trust advice from someone who just came in? 298 yuan is not as good as losing it directly to practice; at least the tuition is cheap. Sounds nice, but isn't it just trying to make money by selling courses? If you have the ability, make money through trading. Information asymmetry is indeed valuable, but what can you teach in this course? Why not just share free solutions? The biggest trap for beginners is buying these kinds of courses. Wake up.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBeggar

· 01-11 18:26

Spending 298 yuan to save yourself from being "harvested" once is already a profit. I believe in this logic. --- Honestly, you still need to experience pitfalls yourself to truly learn a lesson. --- Advice from someone who has been through it is indeed helpful, but only if that person hasn't been scamming new investors. --- The information gap—what you learn through experience always leaves a deeper impression than paying for a course. --- Instead of spending 298 to attend a course, I’d rather know why there are so many traps and still people keep coming in. --- Alright, since we all have to pay tuition fees anyway, might as well pay honest people. --- Listening is fine, but don’t expect that 298 can buy you secret tips; the market isn’t that cheap. --- I’ve heard quite a few of these "I’ve been through the trap, so you don’t have to" stories. --- But honestly, having an average trading level is at least honest, no bragging. --- From a different perspective, spending money on avoiding traps is better than spending it on being "harvested."

View OriginalReply0