2026-01-11 17:00:17

#密码资产动态追踪 $BTC This wave of the market still seems to be testing repeatedly. The forces of bulls and bears are basically evenly matched, but judging from the momentum of the rebound, the buyers are slightly in the lead. On Monday's open, many are pushing upward. Under this rhythm, we might as well wait for a correction before getting in.

Specifically, a pullback to around 90400 is a good entry point; if luck is on our side and it drops to 89800, that would be even better. Pay attention to the key levels at 91800 and 93300, as these are likely to encounter resistance.

In the short term, following this logic, during the tug-of-war between bulls and bears, it’s more prudent to buy on dips.

BTC1,63%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StakeWhisperer

· 01-11 17:27

90400 is indeed a good level, but I still feel like there might be another dip.

View OriginalReply0

gas_guzzler

· 01-11 17:27

I agree with the suggestion to wait for a better entry point, 90400 indeed looks comfortable. But right now, we're still testing the waters repeatedly; maybe around 90800 could be a good spot to try a small position.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenRugs

· 01-11 17:26

Good grief, trying to test the bottom again. The 90400 level is indeed attractive, but I bet it will still drop... Wait, why does it always turn out the opposite every time I analyze it this way? Hold on, this time I really need to listen to advice and not get carried away.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-eb7edcd9

· 01-11 17:23

Thank you very much for the information 👋

View OriginalReply0

YieldHunter

· 01-11 17:02

nah honestly if you look at the data, this whole 90400 vs 89800 thing is just degens trying to time the bottom. technically speaking, the risk-adjusted metrics don't justify waiting imo... impermanent loss hits different when you're already underwater lmao

Reply0