Recently, there has been frequent activity around 6G, but the real opportunities are not in places everyone knows about.
The market is now focused on operators and chip manufacturers, unaware that the key links in the industry chain have already been quietly laid out by institutions. Looking at history makes it clear—every major infrastructure construction boom, the greatest resilience has never been from the main players, but from those behind the scenes "shovels."
Breaking down the 6G industry chain, there are two areas that are particularly worth noting:
**First is network planning and design.** To achieve integrated coverage of air, land, sea, and space, the complexity increases geometrically compared to 5G. This requires companies with advanced planning technology to lead the overall layout. Companies like Higer Communications and Guomai Technology have accumulated significant technical reserves; they play the role of the "brain."
**Second is PCB and substrate materials.** As the spectrum jumps into the terahertz range, the RF hardware requirements for base stations and terminals become extremely demanding. At this point, suppliers of high-frequency high-speed boards become the bottleneck. Companies like Chuanxin Intelligent and Huatian Electronics are leading in this area, representing "neural network" level existence—any technological iteration cannot bypass them.
Currently, the industry is still in the early stages, but capital has already become very perceptive, quietly laying the groundwork for "expectation gaps." Unlike the large-scale bloom during the 5G era, hype around 6G will be more precise—only companies truly involved in core technology standard setting, testing and verification, and mastering key material substitution capabilities can become the next round of core beneficiaries.
In terms of investment rhythm, it can follow the line of "planning first → hardware upgrade → scene application." If timed well, there is still considerable room for leading companies in specific segments.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVSandwichMaker
· 6h ago
Here comes the "shovel theory" of harvesting the little guys again, even before 5G was fully developed.
Institutions quietly making moves? Buddy, these companies have already gone public a long time ago, no need to be sneaky.
Wait a minute, I need to check Huadian Shares; this increase is quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelor
· 6h ago
The shoveling theory is back again, this time with the 6G version? I think it's a bit too absolute to say that.
Wait, stocks like Hudian Co., Ltd. have already been炒过一轮 before. Those who are now taking over should be very cautious.
I think this kind of logic can be applied to every hot topic, but the ones who truly make money are actually those who don't rely on storytelling.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 6h ago
It's the same "shovel theory" again, I'm tired of hearing it haha. But to be honest, Huadian and Benzhuan do have some real substance; they should have jumped on board last year.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 6h ago
It's that "shovel theory" again, talking as if you've had everything planned out all along haha
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAO
· 6h ago
It's the "shovel" theory again, always the same story, but this time I only half believe the logic of Hudian and Benzuan.
They are right about the hardware bottleneck, but I can't shake the feeling that they're just passing the buck to institutions.
PCB materials have already been hyped once before, are there still people lurking around now?
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 6h ago
The shoveling theory is back again. I heard this explanation during the 5G era, but in the end, it's still about relying on the operators' favor to make a living.
To be honest, there is indeed potential on the material side, but can companies like Guomai really turn the tide? I remain skeptical.
Early deployment doesn't matter much; the key is whether subsequent capital will follow. Without that, all efforts are pointless.
Recently, there has been frequent activity around 6G, but the real opportunities are not in places everyone knows about.
The market is now focused on operators and chip manufacturers, unaware that the key links in the industry chain have already been quietly laid out by institutions. Looking at history makes it clear—every major infrastructure construction boom, the greatest resilience has never been from the main players, but from those behind the scenes "shovels."
Breaking down the 6G industry chain, there are two areas that are particularly worth noting:
**First is network planning and design.** To achieve integrated coverage of air, land, sea, and space, the complexity increases geometrically compared to 5G. This requires companies with advanced planning technology to lead the overall layout. Companies like Higer Communications and Guomai Technology have accumulated significant technical reserves; they play the role of the "brain."
**Second is PCB and substrate materials.** As the spectrum jumps into the terahertz range, the RF hardware requirements for base stations and terminals become extremely demanding. At this point, suppliers of high-frequency high-speed boards become the bottleneck. Companies like Chuanxin Intelligent and Huatian Electronics are leading in this area, representing "neural network" level existence—any technological iteration cannot bypass them.
Currently, the industry is still in the early stages, but capital has already become very perceptive, quietly laying the groundwork for "expectation gaps." Unlike the large-scale bloom during the 5G era, hype around 6G will be more precise—only companies truly involved in core technology standard setting, testing and verification, and mastering key material substitution capabilities can become the next round of core beneficiaries.
In terms of investment rhythm, it can follow the line of "planning first → hardware upgrade → scene application." If timed well, there is still considerable room for leading companies in specific segments.