A recent discussion on the Bitcoin-dev mailing list has sparked intense debate around the rapid increase of UTXOs, mainly stemming from Ordinals and Bitcoin Stamps. Many developers warn that uncontrolled, non-monetary UTXO expansion could put significant long-term pressure on network performance and increase node operating costs.
To address this issue, a draft proposal called “The Cat” has been introduced, which suggests permanently marking “non-monetary UTXOs” valued below 1,000 satoshis as unspendable through a soft fork, potentially reducing UTXO size by 30% to 50%. Conversely, the “Lynx” proposal takes a more neutral approach by automatically disabling dust UTXOs that have been inactive for over four years, allowing periodic cleanup of UTXOs without directly interfering with user intent.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Debate in the Bitcoin community over proposed UTXO handling from Ordinals and Stamps
A recent discussion on the Bitcoin-dev mailing list has sparked intense debate around the rapid increase of UTXOs, mainly stemming from Ordinals and Bitcoin Stamps. Many developers warn that uncontrolled, non-monetary UTXO expansion could put significant long-term pressure on network performance and increase node operating costs.
To address this issue, a draft proposal called “The Cat” has been introduced, which suggests permanently marking “non-monetary UTXOs” valued below 1,000 satoshis as unspendable through a soft fork, potentially reducing UTXO size by 30% to 50%. Conversely, the “Lynx” proposal takes a more neutral approach by automatically disabling dust UTXOs that have been inactive for over four years, allowing periodic cleanup of UTXOs without directly interfering with user intent.